Grown ass dudes looking for North Koreans in the field but can’t find any because they don’t deem russia worthy of defending, even they have toilets at home.
You have brain. They just want to hear that Russia is humiliated regardless of what Ukraine will hit with the so called long range missile. The good thing is that, the consequence of the this move will bring the war to and end. Putin has been acting saintly, but will hit hard if Ukraine hit sensitive sites in Russia. His retaliatory actions in Ukraine will force the world to negotiate for peace.
I think they closed the gas pipe going through .. to South of Europe. Perhaps they might even restrick laudenring of oil and other minerals through India.
@@nandotorres4461why not ask putin? Strange that you don't mention the guy that started the war, and could finish it today if he stopped attacking. You russian trolls are too funny. 😅
@@amanjaya-s9vNarcissists very much do care about the future of their existence and lifestyles . It's actually the only thing holding them all back from "pressing buttons"
@@sebastiaanl9876 what a pointless ridiculous statement. They didnt say they were unhappy watching this. They were commenting on the video CONTENT. Do keep up. Wow.
bring it on, you think that such an action won't bring about the full force of NATO against russia? We're giving ukraine our old weapons mostly, russia hasn't seen the advanced stuff in action....when the f22, euro fighter, f35, b2 stealth and so many others turn their attention to russia, you'll find out just what can happen if you start a war with most of the richest nations in the world.
Russia is only being targeted in its own country because it is directing missiles against Ukrainian targets in Ukraine. Its the Ukrainians directing missiles into Russia in self defense.Not the US or UK.
Why would Russia escalate to nuclear war when they only have to wait another 2 months for their meat puppet Trump to bail them out of their own botched war of conquest? Biden is simply improving Ukraine's negotiating position by giving them the ability to do as much damage on the Russian infrastructure as Moscow has been doing to Kyiv.
HIMARS wasn't the game changer? You must have been living under a rock or watching only Russia1 TV channel. Javelins stopped the russian advance in the firs phase of this conflict.
“Why do they (Brits and Francs) need US’s permission to use their missiles” 😅 the question caught the guest unprepared. He was probably thinking: what do you want me to say?
Is firing British missiles into Russia a threat to British national security? Because British millitary personnel have to programme these missiles before some Ukrainian finger pushes the button
Yes, this obvious fact is deliberately omitted in BBC and other mainstream media reports. Targets are identified, acquired and targeted by US military using their satellites. It is credibly reported that US troops are in Ukraine overseeing the set-up of the missiles.
The UK Govt put a post stating they would allow using storm-shadow missiles in Russia but then they removed the post. Looks like they changed their mind hahahaha!!
Nope- this should have been done months ago. Something on the field triggered this response. Also if I understand how transitions work- Trump knows this as well. Infact it’s a great bargaining chip.
@@DrummerSpace Is Russia that stupid to allow nuclear capable missiles that use NATO targeting systems to rain down upon their country? I don't think so. Every missile now entering into Russia has to be assumed to be carrying a nuclear payload. Otherwise NATO could first strike Russia with impunity. The Russians will now first strike. Why. They have no other option. FJB. He doomed us all.
The thing that will change is supply lines. The missiles have caused Russia to already pull back aircraft and logistics further into Russia to prevent it being striked. Hence this will decrease the amount of supplies being supplied to Russian troops but the primary purpose is to slow them down and it would. They have to travel further to resupply. The idea of this is to actually try and give Ukraine more of a better position when it comes to peace negations as it's obvious that's how the war is going to end. It sort of makes sense, causes worry on russian people who are within that radius which will pressure Putin to make it easier to negotiate but again, also to slow the supply and morale of the Russian troops.
@@steveb890 Yes they are because of our support, Ukraine would've folded a long time ago by itself. Despite this they're winning on the battlefield. Kim send the Koreans troops there to gain battle experience, Russia has plenty of men unlike Ukraine.
Its F-16s and Leopard 2 that were seen as war winners. They still could be since Russia is likely not going to achive its primary strategic goal of over running Ukraine and replacing the Zelinsky government by force of arms.
They didn’t get f-15 planes and are still integrating the f-16’s into their air defense systems (and they’re already successful with 11 cruise missiles shot down in the last big attack).
F-16 planes. You are so uneducated that you can't even get that right. Besides the west only supplied the minimal amount of tanks, at a slow pace....did you expect one sword in an army to win the tide?
@@ronin7531 Shooting down 11 cruise missiles in one attack with just a couple of planes working with an integrated air defense system that includes ancient stuff like BUK and HAWK AA is quite impressive. And when did Zelenskyy say that f15’s or anything else would be a silver bullet? He only said that it will help to defend against russian attacks and that it would save Ukrainian lives (and it did both). But go on and try to justify the average of 1500 russian losses per day for the last two months, it’s just day 1001 in russia’s three day special military operation.
All newer weapons supplied or authorised for use by Ukraine have always been described as "game changers." This is not new either. The rhetorics and analyses are becoming boring. Just admit NATO has failed to beat Russia.
@JC-justchillin But the same NATO leaders are saying Ukraine losing means NATO losing. Not sure if NATO leaders are insane for saying such especially that they themselves promised to give Russia a strategic defeat on the battlefield in Ukraine. The shame is now obvious actually.
@@JC-justchillinBut the Russians are also not fully engaged. Let's hope we'll never have to fight the Russians, how come suddenly everyone forgot that the Mutually Assured Destruction doctrine
👈🤡YES THE UNELECTED 🤡 PUTIN WHO STARTED THIS WAR IS A PSYCHOPATH. PUTIN COULD STOP THIS WAR IN AN HOUR ALL HE HAS TO DO IS PULL OUT OF UKRAINE AND STOP HIS LAND GRABS.
From where they currently are, the Ukrainians can already cover the Kursk region with different missiles, rockets and drones. Since the use of ATACMs is restricted to the same region, I cannot see how much difference they will make. Ukraine hasn't a lot of them either, and its war head is relatively small. They certainly do not make a difference in the Donbas, where the Russians have been advancing for months. A lot of hype in the media.
Ukraine was given permission to hit targets threatening their forces in Kursk.That likely means Ukraine can drive ATACMS launchers into the occupied Kursk region and launch them deep into Russia to hit targets beyond the reach of existing drones,rockets and other missile systems.
because the US will be guiding the rockets, not Ukraine. That is the whole god damn point, the US will be guiding the misiles to hit Russian cities, which means the US will be attacking Russia, it is not that hard to understand.
Its just this reporter who thinks its limited to Kursk region. Talking head liar pretending he knows something. As Zelenski said, the missile will do the talking.
@@ScottishAtheist I didn't say he didn't say something. I said he said it is limited to Kursk region; 2:28, according to his "information". I don't believe he actually knows, it's just speculative.
No worries. Looks like Jokin Joey Biden is getting us involved with nuclear war before his departure to a nursing home. Authorizing Ukraine to use long range U.S. missles against Russia. Good luck!
So BBC is telling us that putin will withdraw his army from ukraine because of some missiles?😂, I wonder what theyll tell us after Russia responds with more missiles at ukraine and more territory
Russia is already responding with more missiles at Ukraine for 3 years. We are being told that the more damage Ukraine can inflct into Russia the better negotiating position they are in to get Russians to withdraw from Ukraine in exchange to get back Kursk. Any negotiations would have to be from a basis of Russia giving up something to get something and not just rely on a Trump imposed peace deal where current front lines are frozen. Russia doesn't want parts of Kursk incorporated into Ukraine if the frontlines were frozen,so to get their land back,they had better trade back Ukrainian land in return.
The biggest concern is the escalation of No. Korea being involved. They wouldn't be there if Russia had half the capabilities that these drama queen reporters say they do. They need a solution NOW.
You are right, and to read Annie Jacobsen's book: NUCLEAR. There would be no 'winners'. NO leader should EVER think about using NUCLEAR weapons as a last resort, but nearly all Nato countries have them. We are all run by evil people.
@pK-kw1zt Sounds like you didn't understand what I wrote but it's a different thing to cheer on war and send his troops and cheering on but not sending troops. Thats called being a coward. We want to send missiles into Russia but then we turn around and say that we are not involved. Take some responsibility for once..
@@Jole30 we are involved everybody knows it, because Ukraine asked for help, they don’t want to be part of Russia but can’t defend themselves on their own. That dictator started the war but the west will finished it.
You and I all know it will definitely change nothing, it's not like they were used before to strike within disputed territories but did almost nothing to help on the battlefield.
The thing that will change is supply lines. The missiles have caused Russia to already pull back aircraft and logistics further into Russia to prevent it being striked. Hence this will decrease the amount of supplies being supplied to Russian troops but the primary purpose is to slow them down and it would. They have to travel further to resupply. The idea of this is to actually try and give Ukraine more of a better position when it comes to peace negations as it's obvious that's how the war is going to end. It sort of makes sense, causes worry on russian people who are within that radius which will pressure Putin to make it easier to negotiate but again, also to slow the supply and morale of the Russian troops.
@@ScottishAtheist Syrsky himself warned that the F-16s would not be able to go within 40 Km of the front lines due to the Russian air defenses and so not to expect too much of them.
Why ? Russia can shoot them but Ukraine can't destroy the platforms from where those things come from because they are too ... far ? Very strange logic.
@@nickiseb8910 mate it's about the fact that storm shadows and atacms use british/us intelligence to be programmed/guided. how tf will ukraine make the flight plans without satellites or acces to us/uk's intelligence. this is an escalation because nato operatives are using nato weapons to strike within russia...
this conflict which has nothing to do with the countries supplying the weapons will escalate what could end up to be a possible WW3 , there will always be dispute between countries but there should be no outside interference unless it directly affects them and their citizens
Its a safe assumption people generally watch because they, as you put it, consider their reports and analysis sensible. What's not so obvious is why YOU are still watching given your obvious disapproval for the channel?
Biden administration did this on purpose so that Trump cannot broker peace. Democrats are doing everything they can to sabotage Trump and the United States since they lost the election.
This is exactly the reason why Russia kept asking NATO for 30 years not to move their frontier (and therefore missile dome) closer to Russia from the post Cold War lines, which is why NATO forced Russia to eventually push back. We’re not the good guys here. If we’d just left Eastern Europe alone, this war wouldn’t be happening.
@ it is objectively and observably true now that the missiles Yeltsin didn’t want pointing into his front garden will soon be arriving. Stop drinking the kool aid mate - we caused this war because the globalist bankers can’t control Russia. Wake up.
@ It does if that alliances only purpose is to oppose you. Corporate Globalist banking cabal bot. You go and fight on the front lines of the war you crave then. Send your kids (if you have any, which I doubt)
@cristiangaban960 100% true, but you are either wildly misinformed or part of the misinformation brigade, and I'm 100% British not a Putin apologist. Only psychopsths can support what the US neocons have fomented in Ukraine. Now get off to school, you're late.
but russia is using north korea and iranian weapons in ukraine. What difference does this make? Russia has escalated ut already. The west should stop being puss
These are short range ballistic missiles. 300 km is not long range. Longer range that previous, but not long range. They are little more than a couple of stages of the Tour de France.
Putin knows he will have many pointed back at him he does not want Russia bombed i remember the last time they threatened us when Ragan was in power it was a real threat but this time I think not
Why are they mindlessly referring to ATACAMS as long-range missiles? They have a maximum range of around 300 km. They're short- to medium-range missiles. Medium-range missiles have a range of 300 - 1000 km (meaning the ATACMS barely qualifies as medium-range). Long-range missiles have a range of 1000+ km. For comparison, the AGM-158B JASSM-ER has a range of about 920km and it's classified as a medium-range missile. So pray tell me how an ATACAMS with ⅓ of the range of the AGM-158B JASSM-ER can be a long-range missile?
The thing that will change is supply lines. The missiles have caused Russia to already pull back aircraft and logistics further into Russia to prevent it being striked. Hence this will decrease the amount of supplies being supplied to Russian troops but the primary purpose is to slow them down and it would. They have to travel further to resupply. The idea of this is to actually try and give Ukraine more of a better position when it comes to peace negations as it's obvious that's how the war is going to end. It sort of makes sense, causes worry on russian people who are within that radius which will pressure Putin to make it easier to negotiate but again, also to slow the supply and morale of the Russian troops.
North Korean troops are not on Ukrainian soil… so how is this an escalation if Russia and N Korea hv a pact. How is this different from US troops in Germany ?
Because now Ukraine can make those same pacts 🤔🤔 Which brings more and more countries into this...which constitutes the term 'escalation' Just read a dictionary 🤷♂️
@@TalibanAtrocities There is no escalation in self defence, the whole claim is a brainfart. The only one escalating is ru every day it doesn't leave Ukraine.
I'd guess strategic targets, ammunition depots, troop concentrations, railway links. That kind of thing will be a target. It's not a 'wonder' weapon. However, the cumulative effect slows resupply. It means staging weapons platforms further back.
ATACMS 330km range (is not “long range”). Russia uses Iranian cruise missiles with a 1350km range. Russia is 9,000km wide. ATACMS can reach 3% of Russia. Ukraine is 1,316km wide. Russia can reach 100% of Ukraine Russia is 97% safe from ATACMS. Ukraine is 0% safe from Russian cruise missiles.
Russia does not use iranian missiles, there have never been an iranian missile fired into ukraine. No prove of that. Even the so called shahid drone Russia only used it for 3 months and then they developed their own galled geranium drone. But the rest of what you said is correct
1. Russia is 97% empty. The most populated area is in the west. 2. Unlike Russian and Iranian weapons, ATACMS are for hitting key targets supporting the military. Not flattening cities.
We've already given perms few months ago. Doubtful his presence here will change anything. But a Russian politician Sergei Markov threatened us with nukes before Xmas yesterday on times radio...that probably should have warranted a response from government
We are about to pull all funds in military aid from Ukraine do you really think little Putin is going to be thinking about world war III when he has a couple months to wait he can't even fight off the ukrainians let alone the US and its allies let's get real
Ukraine have had these missiles, along with other weapon systems to use in Ukraine and the eastern defences are crumbling. I dont think they are the game changer the media likes to think they are.
What happened to other game changers like the once hyped F-16's,Abram or Challenger tanks and so funny Russia has been destroying and jamming the very same depleted useless Atacms and Storm Shadows and they have failed dismaly to bring down the Crimean bridge due to highly advanced Russian air defence systems like the S-400 for example.
It's a representative democracy, which inherently means 99.999% of government decisions aren't voted for. The only recent one that was would be Brexit. That went well.......
Absolutely. It's our lives they are gambling with. A lot of people are under the illusion that America have the greatest of all warfare weapons and are the saviour of the world... along with their Nato friends! Russia is a country that has seen a LOT of casualties in their history, and have seen the West's tactics and dishonesty towards them , so I am sure over the passing years that they have been preparing for any future conflict. NOW after Biden's reckless (and nasty calculated) decision, we might ALL experience the reality. Ordinary members of the public do NOT deserve the consequences of their STUPID decisions , ESPECIALLY when Russia have repeatedly warned of the consequences. In contrast to America who did NOT give any warnings when they dropped their 'bombs' ALL those years ago .
"I must break you" "If he dies, he dies" "You will lose" "To the end" "He is not human, he is a piece of iron" "I win for me! FOR ME!" "I defeat all man. Soon I defeat real champion" "I can not be defeated. I beat all man. Someday, I will beat a real champion. If he dies, he dies" 🇦🇺
Use the money to help the lives of most British people. At this point we need hope for our future by building better services to help the health of British people
Lmao another magical game changer. Ukraine had use of numerous domestic missiles that could strike within Russia many more modern than the ATACMS sent to them. They try all the time and yet only a few get through.
No they didn't. Ukraine has been using drones and British and French cruise missiles to strike into Russia. Those systems have much shorter range and smaller warheads than the ATACMS. The fact that Ukraine is still able to slug it out with Russia after nearly 3 years in a war Russia expected to win in three days seems to show that western military aid has been a game changer. You may find that funny,but I doubt all the dead Russia soldiers killed by western weapons do.
Tentu saja itu akan merubah permainan, yaitu, Rusia menganggap anda sedang berperang melawan mereka, dan kita akan segera melihat wajib militer menimpa para pemuda eropa. Ekonomi hancur dan rakyat menderita di garis depan. Sementara kami melihat kalian di tv. Sunguh menyedihkan
In the first place why will one grab a piece of land from another sovereign state. We should not allow that to happen. Nations should have a right to make their own decisions.
You have a LOT of patience! Zelensky 'begging' for weapons and money to fight his near neighbour, has been grating on my nerves since the beginning! Because this is America's proxy war with Russia, Z. has been fawned over and indulged. He isn't even the legitimate President of Ukraine, since 20th? May this year. He is already a very wealthy man, but morally bankrupt. And I think he will NEVER know a moment 's peace for the rest of his life.
@@TheLAGopher Yes that’s the reason why the west bow down to his requests. Plus war is very lucrative. But my point is that he expects it and throws his toys out the pram when he doesn’t get it. Then when he does get it, he wants more!
Grown ass dudes giggling at growing probability of nuclear war, right - enough RUclips for today
Grown ass dudes looking for North Koreans in the field but can’t find any because they don’t deem russia worthy of defending, even they have toilets at home.
They won't use nukes
Fr . War equals money for the elites we die like pawns for there gain
@strongmandave5662 thoughts and prayers
@@KMSniper300 not in a nuke war
BBC is so excited at the possibility of a major conflict escalation.
Why? That's the question.
Thats because they want it
Giddy
Russia escalated by invading Ukraine and by welcoming North Korean troops.
That's because they are imbeciles
Europeans are happy at what Ukraine will do but nobody is talking about how Russia will respond. That scares me
Putler is gay 🌈 sparkly ✨ fairy 🧚
You have brain. They just want to hear that Russia is humiliated regardless of what Ukraine will hit with the so called long range missile.
The good thing is that, the consequence of the this move will bring the war to and end. Putin has been acting saintly, but will hit hard if Ukraine hit sensitive sites in Russia. His retaliatory actions in Ukraine will force the world to negotiate for peace.
I think they closed the gas pipe going through .. to South of Europe. Perhaps they might even restrick laudenring of oil and other minerals through India.
They will throw another 700,000 casualties at the problem.
Russia responded by adding North Korea if they do anything we're showing that North Korean troops are a red line
What about the carbon footprint of the missiles 😂🤣
lol exactly.
They are solar powered made from soy beans. Completely recyclable.
What about the carbon footprint of Putin invading. Putin should go home.
I could say the same about the shit they talk 😂
We need to inform Greta Thunberg that climate is no longer changing because it involves attacking Russia
Remember what a role of BBC did during the invasion of Iraq
They're well known Lying Barstewarts.
they BBC is going in deep
Yes, reporting a war. Russia prefers to create wars
Look at what RT is doing today.
😂
Peace!! All humanity is at risk.
Ask Biden and Netanyahu
Those politicians don't care
@@nandotorres4461why not ask putin? Strange that you don't mention the guy that started the war, and could finish it today if he stopped attacking. You russian trolls are too funny. 😅
@@amanjaya-s9vNarcissists very much do care about the future of their existence and lifestyles . It's actually the only thing holding them all back from "pressing buttons"
@ScottishAtheist Ukraine cedes the Donbas and the other 2 republics too, if Russia is to stop.
The sheer amount of delusion is absurd
And still you are watching
👈🤡YES THE DELUSION IN THE PATHETIC BRAINWASHED RUSSIAN BOT IS HILARIOUS
@@sebastiaanl9876 what a pointless ridiculous statement. They didnt say they were unhappy watching this. They were commenting on the video CONTENT. Do keep up. Wow.
@@oddities-whatnotI never thought I would see so many Putin sympathizers 😂 he’s a dictator what’s so hard to understand
@@sebastiaanl9876yes, it's worth knowing how stupid government mouth pieces believe us to be.
Do this and Russia have every right to direct missiles on UK and US targets…in their own countries…..how stupid are you all ?
Very stupid if you ask me, i have lost faith in our public, thryey are completely on a different planet.
bring it on, you think that such an action won't bring about the full force of NATO against russia? We're giving ukraine our old weapons mostly, russia hasn't seen the advanced stuff in action....when the f22, euro fighter, f35, b2 stealth and so many others turn their attention to russia, you'll find out just what can happen if you start a war with most of the richest nations in the world.
@@SilentWalker-if4nc they might not be on this one much longer
Russia is only being targeted in its own country because it is directing missiles against Ukrainian targets in Ukraine. Its the Ukrainians
directing missiles into Russia in self defense.Not the US or UK.
Hahahaha!
I got out of Britain in 2020- can't stand the idiots in parliament...
What has that got to do with US missiles being used by Ukraine?
@davetrousers ..if you can't see the connection then don't worry- can't fix a low IQ, just go back to your crayons and cartoons...
Clowns, presiding over a circus to get us all killed.
Unless you've moved to *Mars* you've just traded one set of idiots for another set so you're hardly a genius.
You can run but you can't hide from these idiots.
Why now? Biden is old and going out. He will take the entire world with him. 😅
Why would Russia escalate to nuclear war when they only have to wait another 2 months for their meat puppet Trump to bail them out of their
own botched war of conquest? Biden is simply improving Ukraine's negotiating position by giving them the ability to do as much damage on the
Russian infrastructure as Moscow has been doing to Kyiv.
your right
You're absolutely right. He should have given Ukraine permission two years ago.
It was in direct response to North Korea entering the war.
@@stephenwalker5264I hope your in Ukraine
So javelins, challengers and himars weren't game changers but this is?
I think they were really sophisticated as we may have understood them...
they also had storm shadows
Ya all the game changers have not changed the game
HIMARS wasn't the game changer? You must have been living under a rock or watching only Russia1 TV channel. Javelins stopped the russian advance in the firs phase of this conflict.
@@atariukass1 ok that's great but who's winning the war right now?
Give it two weeks we will start talking about a new game changer
😂😂😂😂😂
This shit needs to stop what a waste of human life .
@PatrickKingJr It can stop. All Putin needs to do is go home. Really just that simple.
Hours mate hours
Agree, but the deck of cards seems to be running out.
The nonsense continues
It will continue until Russia goes home.
@@stephenwalker5264you are insane, go fight for Ukraine, keyboard warrior.
@@stephenwalker5264Are you dumb ? You are still thinking Russia will go home ?
@@stephenwalker5264 Russia already at home, NATO should go home from Russia borders BBC Zombie xDD
@@vespercore8882 Russia will lose this war. What will you say then.
Strange that he doesn't mention that US troops will control , programme and target the systems and become legitimate Russian targets
Nonsense.The launchers are manned by Ukrainains.The targeting data comes from the US forces in NATO countries.
They think we don’t know
@@mtbworld3904they know most of their audience is so brainless to understand that.
They hate the occupant as much as the next guy
We ain't scared
Imagine disliking an incoming president so much, you'd risk starting WW3.
Nonsense
@shoja2009 Is it! Funny how they refused to let the Ukrainians fire them into Russia before the election for fear of escalation, but now it's ok?
Its not as if that incoming President didn't hate the sitting President so much he wasn't ready to risk Civil War sending a mob to storm Congress.
Another orange clown cult follower. Grow up
@@shoja2009how nonsense I think you are nonsense
“Why do they (Brits and Francs) need US’s permission to use their missiles” 😅 the question caught the guest unprepared. He was probably thinking: what do you want me to say?
Европа- колония США. Правители Европы назначают в США.
Because Ukraine need American technology and. Satellites to guide them to their targets
@@eleanorsmith2558 Because the US is running the show... that's more or less what he was implying, at least he's not wrong 😅
US is their Daddy.
Exactly
Is firing British missiles into Russia a threat to British national security? Because British millitary personnel have to programme these missiles before some Ukrainian finger pushes the button
In a nutshell, yes.
Zelensky gonna push it himself
Yes, this obvious fact is deliberately omitted in BBC and other mainstream media reports.
Targets are identified, acquired and targeted by US military using their satellites. It is credibly reported that US troops are in Ukraine overseeing the set-up of the missiles.
Meanwhile our borders are wide open. With tens of thousands of fighting age men coming in.
The UK Govt put a post stating they would allow using storm-shadow missiles in Russia but then they removed the post. Looks like they changed their mind hahahaha!!
Biden leaving a mess before being booted out. Genius.
he's pissing on convict trump's parade. 🤣
Dementia
@@NoUsername-cq6yp😢Trump will not change anything either
Nope- this should have been done months ago. Something on the field triggered this response.
Also if I understand how transitions work- Trump knows this as well.
Infact it’s a great bargaining chip.
@@DrummerSpace Is Russia that stupid to allow nuclear capable missiles that use NATO targeting systems to rain down upon their country?
I don't think so. Every missile now entering into Russia has to be assumed to be carrying a nuclear payload.
Otherwise NATO could first strike Russia with impunity.
The Russians will now first strike. Why. They have no other option.
FJB. He doomed us all.
Oh look, another game-changer. Just like all those other game-changes that changed nothing.
The thing that will change is supply lines. The missiles have caused Russia to already pull back aircraft and logistics further into Russia to prevent it being striked. Hence this will decrease the amount of supplies being supplied to Russian troops but the primary purpose is to slow them down and it would. They have to travel further to resupply. The idea of this is to actually try and give Ukraine more of a better position when it comes to peace negations as it's obvious that's how the war is going to end. It sort of makes sense, causes worry on russian people who are within that radius which will pressure Putin to make it easier to negotiate but again, also to slow the supply and morale of the Russian troops.
And it's FAIR..... 😢😮😊
This time everyone knows that this isn't a game changer but another try to antagonise Putin even further.
"changed nothing" ? ....Russia are still struggling after three years and now begging Korea for help !
@@steveb890 Yes they are because of our support, Ukraine would've folded a long time ago by itself. Despite this they're winning on the battlefield. Kim send the Koreans troops there to gain battle experience, Russia has plenty of men unlike Ukraine.
Don't pay for propaganda!
Cancel your TV licence today
I canceled it a long time ago
Never paid it.
Suck on Rogan for your independent news
Well said
👈🤡I DONT PAY FOR ONE BUT I AINT LIKE YOU. YOU ARE JUST SCARED OF FACTS
Same thing was said for F-15 planes , and the Almighty leopards A1, bullocks
Its F-16s and Leopard 2 that were seen as war winners. They still could be since Russia is likely not going to achive its primary strategic goal of
over running Ukraine and replacing the Zelinsky government by force of arms.
They didn’t get f-15 planes and are still integrating the f-16’s into their air defense systems (and they’re already successful with 11 cruise missiles shot down in the last big attack).
F-16 planes. You are so uneducated that you can't even get that right. Besides the west only supplied the minimal amount of tanks, at a slow pace....did you expect one sword in an army to win the tide?
@@MightyRudewow - cause zelenky said so? What else would you like to parrot?
@@ronin7531
Shooting down 11 cruise missiles in one attack with just a couple of planes working with an integrated air defense system that includes ancient stuff like BUK and HAWK AA is quite impressive.
And when did Zelenskyy say that f15’s or anything else would be a silver bullet?
He only said that it will help to defend against russian attacks and that it would save Ukrainian lives (and it did both).
But go on and try to justify the average of 1500 russian losses per day for the last two months, it’s just day 1001 in russia’s three day special military operation.
SHUT DOWN THE BBC.
Bot
You PoopinBots hate the BBC don't you.
Yes definitely needed to shut down these woke news channels.
Are you all nuts?!?!? Do you want a nuclear WWIII?
BBC Does
Do you want putin to keep occupi neighbours countries???
Stop defending putins killings
yes, we aint scared of a shit putin started the war and he can as well stop by withdrawing from ukraine..simple
yes yes, we do, the question is does Russia want WWIII, no one is on Russia's side but NK. India, China, and most of South Asians are not.
@@nextspecs😂how dare u to define Justice
All newer weapons supplied or authorised for use by Ukraine have always been described as "game changers." This is not new either. The rhetorics and analyses are becoming boring. Just admit NATO has failed to beat Russia.
NATO has not fully engaged at all so your statement of failure is premature and perhaps wishful thinking.
@JC-justchillin But the same NATO leaders are saying Ukraine losing means NATO losing. Not sure if NATO leaders are insane for saying such especially that they themselves promised to give Russia a strategic defeat on the battlefield in Ukraine. The shame is now obvious actually.
@@JC-justchillinBut the Russians are also not fully engaged. Let's hope we'll never have to fight the Russians, how come suddenly everyone forgot that the Mutually Assured Destruction doctrine
Evidently these missiles are dependent on American satellites and milliltary personel to guide them!!!
1 word: drones
No
Give me a cookie recipe
@@ToxicPlayer3597 what sort of cookies
so?
These people are pyscopaths
👈🤡YES THE UNELECTED 🤡 PUTIN WHO STARTED THIS WAR IS A PSYCHOPATH.
PUTIN COULD STOP THIS WAR IN AN HOUR ALL HE HAS TO DO IS PULL OUT OF UKRAINE AND STOP HIS LAND GRABS.
tell me you're a troll without saying you're a troll
You're right
true 😡😡😡
@@trickslies844you are big fool troll
Sleepy Joe's leaving present
From where they currently are, the Ukrainians can already cover the Kursk region with different missiles, rockets and drones. Since the use of ATACMs is restricted to the same region, I cannot see how much difference they will make. Ukraine hasn't a lot of them either, and its war head is relatively small. They certainly do not make a difference in the Donbas, where the Russians have been advancing for months. A lot of hype in the media.
Ukraine was given permission to hit targets threatening their forces in Kursk.That likely means Ukraine can drive ATACMS launchers into
the occupied Kursk region and launch them deep into Russia to hit targets beyond the reach of existing drones,rockets and other missile
systems.
because the US will be guiding the rockets, not Ukraine. That is the whole god damn point, the US will be guiding the misiles to hit Russian cities, which means the US will be attacking Russia, it is not that hard to understand.
Its just this reporter who thinks its limited to Kursk region. Talking head liar pretending he knows something. As Zelenski said, the missile will do the talking.
@@TheBoobanlisten to the report, he JUST said what you said he didn't say.
@@ScottishAtheist I didn't say he didn't say something. I said he said it is limited to Kursk region; 2:28, according to his "information". I don't believe he actually knows, it's just speculative.
Nice knowing you all 👋
No it wasn't 🤮
It seems that you're not really giving this situation much thought. Why do you think it will escalate?
No worries. Looks like Jokin Joey Biden is getting us involved with nuclear war before his departure to a nursing home. Authorizing Ukraine to use long range U.S. missles against Russia. Good luck!
@@Think666_🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Get your t-levels checked.
Change? You mean escalate the war
you sound nervous, bot 😁
@@JiTiAr35And You sound like a war mongering idiot. Get off your keyboard and go to the front line then.
@JiTiAr35 😂 Too right
@@JiTiAr35 You should be nervous genius. If NATO started a war with Russia, it would lose. Current circumstances prove it.
@@Mordalo yes. if , right?
Putin bots always have too much imagination.
If that, if this
Warmongers at BBC loving it
Oh look , a peacenik.
@@Kohagaan A gopnik
@@proselytizingorthodoxpente8304 a vatnik disguised as peacenik.
@@proselytizingorthodoxpente8304 more like a vatnik disguised as peacenik .
Its called reporting actual events
So BBC is telling us that putin will withdraw his army from ukraine because of some missiles?😂, I wonder what theyll tell us after Russia responds with more missiles at ukraine and more territory
BBC is pro-establishment and pro-Ukraine, just like all other mainstream media in the West.
They can try
Russia is already responding with more missiles at Ukraine for 3 years. We are being told that the more damage Ukraine can inflct into Russia
the better negotiating position they are in to get Russians to withdraw from Ukraine in exchange to get back Kursk. Any negotiations would have to
be from a basis of Russia giving up something to get something and not just rely on a Trump imposed peace deal where current front lines are frozen.
Russia doesn't want parts of Kursk incorporated into Ukraine if the frontlines were frozen,so to get their land back,they had better trade back
Ukrainian land in return.
👈🤡NO THATS NOT WHAT THEY ARE SAYING YOU PATHETIC BRAINWASHED RUSSIAN BOT
The biggest concern is the escalation of No. Korea being involved. They wouldn't be there if Russia had half the capabilities that these drama queen reporters say they do. They need a solution NOW.
The best thing the BBC can do is air Threads, the 1984 film they made to show the results of poor decisions.
They won't... it's not diverse enough!
Another red line? 😂
The first minute sounded like pure Propaganda, biased comments to lead you into their selected "experts " opinion.
Back when the bbc tried
You are right, and to read Annie Jacobsen's book: NUCLEAR.
There would be no 'winners'.
NO leader should EVER think about using NUCLEAR weapons as a last resort, but nearly all Nato countries have them. We are all run by evil people.
Host looks happy
Not even ask the respond that will come from Russia 😢
He is bbc,that is just the look of a moron.
You should worry about how long range Russian missiles have instead of cheering on a war that you are a coward to participate in
Russia is the antagonist here. You're siding with a dictatorship and a war criminal.
Ukraine is not even part of NATO
But can shoot missiles in Ukraine because he’s not cheering on war right? Listen to yourself 😂
@pK-kw1zt Sounds like you didn't understand what I wrote but it's a different thing to cheer on war and send his troops and cheering on but not sending troops. Thats called being a coward. We want to send missiles into Russia but then we turn around and say that we are not involved. Take some responsibility for once..
@@Jole30 we are involved everybody knows it, because Ukraine asked for help, they don’t want to be part of Russia but can’t defend themselves on their own. That dictator started the war but the west will finished it.
You and I all know it will definitely change nothing, it's not like they were used before to strike within disputed territories but did almost nothing to help on the battlefield.
Exactly. They have made little impact in the Crimea direction.
They have been using it to strike Donbass and Crimea and even a crowded beach and it didnt stop Russia from advancing on several fronts
The thing that will change is supply lines. The missiles have caused Russia to already pull back aircraft and logistics further into Russia to prevent it being striked. Hence this will decrease the amount of supplies being supplied to Russian troops but the primary purpose is to slow them down and it would. They have to travel further to resupply. The idea of this is to actually try and give Ukraine more of a better position when it comes to peace negations as it's obvious that's how the war is going to end. It sort of makes sense, causes worry on russian people who are within that radius which will pressure Putin to make it easier to negotiate but again, also to slow the supply and morale of the Russian troops.
@@Hereford1642you want to tell that to all the rusting russian radar systems?
@@ScottishAtheist Syrsky himself warned that the F-16s would not be able to go within 40 Km of the front lines due to the Russian air defenses and so not to expect too much of them.
Better get ready for some serious global warming
Russian Servers on overdrive
Looking at China's fossile fuel use it is anyway too late. We are the last generation.
@@utubebroadcaster yup
This is absolute lunacy.
Why ? Russia can shoot them but Ukraine can't destroy the platforms from where those things come from because they are too ... far ? Very strange logic.
@@nickiseb8910 mate it's about the fact that storm shadows and atacms use british/us intelligence to be programmed/guided. how tf will ukraine make the flight plans without satellites or acces to us/uk's intelligence. this is an escalation because nato operatives are using nato weapons to strike within russia...
@@nickiseb8910Because it could lead to Russia using strategic weapons and destroying Ukraine.
@@nickiseb8910I'm guessing Russia doesn't need to abide by the Cuban Missile Crisis Agreement like N.A.T.O not abiding by the Budapest Memorandum?
elon? is that you?
this conflict which has nothing to do with the countries supplying the weapons will escalate what could end up to be a possible WW3 , there will always be dispute between countries but there should be no outside interference unless it directly affects them and their citizens
you mean small weak countries should suffer silently at the hands of stronger bullies. F... your logic
So Russia should be free to ramage against its neighbors because they might go nuclear if the world says "Knock it off"?
This is your proposal - to give 40 million people to Russian occupation. Weak coward.
do you remember fellow named hitler?
what happened when uk and france chose not to get involved ?
Pull the ladder up jack
The journalist and so called military expert are deluded fools it’s not a computer game
Remember with game changing weapons?
1. Leopard
2. Challengeer
3. ATACM
4. Storm Shadow
5. F-16
6. Abrams
None of them work
Russian bots need to make up their minds. Either western weapons don't matter,or Russia might go nuclear if we let Ukraine use them.Which is it?
So how come Putin's 3 day special military operation has lasted a thousand days?
Did Putin actually say that @@proselytizingorthodoxpente8304
@@proselytizingorthodoxpente8304And you got 3 day operations from where? Media repeating foolishness? Remember, Russia hold 23% of territory.
@@she825 You're saying Putin planned for his special military operation to last 3 years?
"Putin withdraws his army from Ukraine and begs for mercy. Russia starts paying reparations". Then Zelensky wakes up.
Lol
Why on earth are people still watching the BBC. There are so many other outlets where you can get sensible reports and analysis.
You watch too
Including you 😅
Its a safe assumption people generally watch because they, as you put it, consider their reports and analysis sensible.
What's not so obvious is why YOU are still watching given your obvious disapproval for the channel?
I'm just here to read comments, the volume is muted and I'm not watching the video.
@@1112viggo keeping an eye on the opposition.
ATACMS is the new wonder weapon. Previously It was Abrams and Leopard battle tanks, then HIMASS, Storm shadow, F16 and they all came to nothing.
Biden administration did this on purpose so that Trump cannot broker peace. Democrats are doing everything they can to sabotage Trump and the United States since they lost the election.
How do you know they came to "nothing". Do you have detailed information about their impact?
@@llpqazz😂which impact the Frontline impact 😂
How is it nothing when Ukraine has held back Russia for a thousand days..
Ukraine is still fighting that's huge
Another NON-STARTER game charger wonder weapon. How are those F16's going?
Imo the F-16's are only there to provide defence to Ukrainian cities from Russian missiles. They were never intended to be used aggressively.
This is exactly the reason why Russia kept asking NATO for 30 years not to move their frontier (and therefore missile dome) closer to Russia from the post Cold War lines, which is why NATO forced Russia to eventually push back.
We’re not the good guys here. If we’d just left Eastern Europe alone, this war wouldn’t be happening.
not true
Russian bot propaganda. An alliance expanding doesn’t give you the right to invade a country, never mind one outside of that alliance.
@ it is objectively and observably true now that the missiles Yeltsin didn’t want pointing into his front garden will soon be arriving.
Stop drinking the kool aid mate - we caused this war because the globalist bankers can’t control Russia.
Wake up.
@ It does if that alliances only purpose is to oppose you.
Corporate Globalist banking cabal bot.
You go and fight on the front lines of the war you crave then.
Send your kids (if you have any, which I doubt)
@cristiangaban960 100% true, but you are either wildly misinformed or part of the misinformation brigade, and I'm 100% British not a Putin apologist. Only psychopsths can support what the US neocons have fomented in Ukraine. Now get off to school, you're late.
Buttering up this matter is ridiculous! This is fastening matters to WW3!
but russia is using north korea and iranian weapons in ukraine. What difference does this make? Russia has escalated ut already. The west should stop being puss
And we still get morons shouting, let's give them more.
Wtf is Biden doing?
As much as Abrams, Bayraktar, F-16, Himars changed…
Less, not enough missiles to spare (allegedly by Pentagon).
The war Russia thought they would win in 3 days is going on 3 years. Yeah things have changed.
@@Virtus555there are no evidence that NKorean troops are participating at the battlefield
HIMARS changed quite a lot. Takes just a minute to learn how.
@@YoGranDaddyEvilUkraine next to Moscow??
These are short range ballistic missiles. 300 km is not long range. Longer range that previous, but not long range. They are little more than a couple of stages of the Tour de France.
I can't believe the glee with which they discuss these weapons. Sleep-walking into global conflict.
I guess the world never learned its lessons about appeasing authoritarians.. hint: they always want more.
The use of nukes total insanity
Won't happen
👈🤡NOONE IS USING NUKES YOU 🤡.
😂😂
Putin knows he will have many pointed back at him he does not want Russia bombed i remember the last time they threatened us when Ragan was in power it was a real threat but this time I think not
@@colinparks619 at least not now. They'll threaten it but they know it's not deep enough conflict to do that
@@colinparks619 I have the feeling they're pressing Vlad to do this first, these people are hellbent on an all out war
People are excited about the use of long range weapons, but did they ever thought of the possible consequences from Russia?
An old staggering man described as "a lame duck president" is sleepwalking the Collective West into World War 3.
What a silly analysis!
Why are they mindlessly referring to ATACAMS as long-range missiles? They have a maximum range of around 300 km. They're short- to medium-range missiles. Medium-range missiles have a range of 300 - 1000 km (meaning the ATACMS barely qualifies as medium-range).
Long-range missiles have a range of 1000+ km.
For comparison, the AGM-158B JASSM-ER has a range of about 920km and it's classified as a medium-range missile. So pray tell me how an ATACAMS with ⅓ of the range of the AGM-158B JASSM-ER can be a long-range missile?
Putin always threat about the west. if the missile reach in Kremlin........... PUTIN not effective dictator & SHAME ITSELF THR THE WEST, 😂😂😂
I would guess because JASSM-ER is launched from the air. For a ground launched missile, its long range.
Nothing will change
The panicked trolls on here suggest otherwise
You think It won't escalate? Wow
Politicians were dying for the deal 💵💰💵💰💵💰💵
@@marcosalves9684 Escalate with what? Like what do you think Russia still has left to use?
The thing that will change is supply lines. The missiles have caused Russia to already pull back aircraft and logistics further into Russia to prevent it being striked. Hence this will decrease the amount of supplies being supplied to Russian troops but the primary purpose is to slow them down and it would. They have to travel further to resupply. The idea of this is to actually try and give Ukraine more of a better position when it comes to peace negations as it's obvious that's how the war is going to end. It sort of makes sense, causes worry on russian people who are within that radius which will pressure Putin to make it easier to negotiate but again, also to slow the supply and morale of the Russian troops.
North Korean troops are not on Ukrainian soil… so how is this an escalation if Russia and N Korea hv a pact. How is this different from US troops in Germany ?
"North Korean troops are not on Ukrainian soil"
Yes they are and Germany isn't invading anyone.
Because now Ukraine can make those same pacts 🤔🤔
Which brings more and more countries into this...which constitutes the term 'escalation'
Just read a dictionary 🤷♂️
@@TalibanAtrocities There is no escalation in self defence, the whole claim is a brainfart. The only one escalating is ru every day it doesn't leave Ukraine.
I'd guess strategic targets, ammunition depots, troop concentrations, railway links. That kind of thing will be a target. It's not a 'wonder' weapon. However, the cumulative effect slows resupply. It means staging weapons platforms further back.
ATACMS 330km range (is not “long range”).
Russia uses Iranian cruise missiles with a 1350km range.
Russia is 9,000km wide. ATACMS can reach 3% of Russia.
Ukraine is 1,316km wide. Russia can reach 100% of Ukraine
Russia is 97% safe from ATACMS. Ukraine is 0% safe from Russian cruise missiles.
*Flagged for Misinformation*
Russia does not use iranian missiles, there have never been an iranian missile fired into ukraine. No prove of that.
Even the so called shahid drone
Russia only used it for 3 months and then they developed their own galled geranium drone.
But the rest of what you said is correct
1. Russia is 97% empty. The most populated area is in the west. 2. Unlike Russian and Iranian weapons, ATACMS are for hitting key targets supporting the military. Not flattening cities.
@littlefluffybushbaby7256 you really are stupid
WWIII, here it begins
Laugh!
Nah
@@BobDylan-ho2gd yah its ww3 i have dreamt its happening 2024 December
If I had a dollar for every time I heard this, I would be rich.
Get a grip scaredy pants
Few individuals benefit from Ukraine war and contractor are on higher alert to rebuilt Ukraine
There is always someone who will go and make a good earner out of any situation...
just remember history, they make money in war 😢
AND STAMER IS LOOKING AT A GREEN COUNTRY COME ON IF WW3 STARTS IT WON'T MATTER
We've already given perms few months ago.
Doubtful his presence here will change anything.
But a Russian politician Sergei Markov threatened us with nukes before Xmas yesterday on times radio...that probably should have warranted a response from government
We are about to pull all funds in military aid from Ukraine do you really think little Putin is going to be thinking about world war III when he has a couple months to wait he can't even fight off the ukrainians let alone the US and its allies let's get real
Elections should be held in Ukraine
Ukraine have had these missiles, along with other weapon systems to use in Ukraine and the eastern defences are crumbling. I dont think they are the game changer the media likes to think they are.
Wow, the host is so happy and jubilant: the war just got a lot more serious.
What happened to other game changers like the once hyped F-16's,Abram or Challenger tanks and so funny Russia has been destroying and jamming the very same depleted useless Atacms and Storm Shadows and they have failed dismaly to bring down the Crimean bridge due to highly advanced Russian air defence systems like the S-400 for example.
Dude you are smoking crack 😂. Trust me there is no advance word in Russian army 😂😂😂
WW3 now imminent should have been the title of this bizarre news article!
WW3 is not mminent, thats just properganda. How long has Putin been going on about nukes? Only Putin wants to nuke people.
No, no. We don't want the public thinking about THAT, they might wake tf up.& start demanding peace
"guys this time it's actually WW3!!! ignore all the other times I said it! this one is for real!!!"
Putin started this. He will be as hated as Hitler and deservedly
Iran 🇮🇷 support Palestine 🇵🇸
USA 🇺🇸 support Israel 🇮🇱
Respect to Iran 🇮🇷
Shame on USA 🇺🇸
Shame on you… your parents failed you.
Not in my name. I was never asked about this, nore was the British public.
It's a representative democracy, which inherently means 99.999% of government decisions aren't voted for.
The only recent one that was would be Brexit.
That went well.......
Ukraine did not want this either so they have a right to strike back
Absolutely. It's our lives they are gambling with.
A lot of people are under the illusion that America have the greatest of all warfare weapons and are the saviour of the world... along with their Nato friends!
Russia is a country that has seen a LOT of casualties in their history, and have seen the West's tactics and dishonesty towards them , so I am sure over the passing years that they have been preparing for any future conflict.
NOW after Biden's reckless (and nasty calculated) decision, we might ALL experience the reality.
Ordinary members of the public do NOT deserve the consequences of their STUPID decisions , ESPECIALLY when Russia have repeatedly warned of the consequences.
In contrast to America who did NOT give any warnings when they dropped their 'bombs' ALL those years ago .
Yeah but not with our weapons!!!!
If zelenski is that dumb then Trump needs to cut off all future funds starting next year
Actually, there are not so much targets inside 300 km zone from front... We remembered that they were trying to hit plutong of infantry
They have not been targeting the Russian military. Thay hame been using them north, on towns.😢
@@user-fr3hy9uh6ysketchy russian bot
@user-fr3hy9uh6y 😁the author erased my comment
Ukraine should appoint another president immediately and stop the war. This war has destroyed such a beautiful country Ukraine completely.
Stop the war ? you mean surrender
I happened to stumble upon this video.
cause Helicopter Support flies: "God knows where...as usual... WTF!? is Sudzha!?"
Who cares?!
people ae disgusting look how you can read news about war and act like its a baseball game your all ridiculous
None of European countries are able to strike inside of Russia not even USA 😂
Bot comment section.
You need to go fight for Ukraine instead of grandstanding.
"I must break you"
"If he dies, he dies"
"You will lose"
"To the end"
"He is not human, he is a piece of iron"
"I win for me! FOR ME!"
"I defeat all man. Soon I defeat real champion"
"I can not be defeated. I beat all man. Someday, I will beat a real champion. If he dies, he dies"
🇦🇺
?
Rich Brits have better reason to leave UK and settle in NZ😂
Senile Joe’s departure gift WWIII.
bbc warmongers
Use the money to help the lives of most British people. At this point we need hope for our future by building better services to help the health of British people
It will let our earth become nuclear winter
It seems that you're forgetting the strategic limitations of nuclear weapons
oh, no it won't, calm down. Putin has threatened nukes so often at this point, his threats mean nothing
Why everybody pay tv licence? Armagedon coming, stop support propaganda
Don’t poke the bear Ukraine
Bald eagles don't like being plucked
@@newphaze-gz2kfMaybe they should just stay bald than
Russia is a bear facade, but really a house of cards.
What? Another nuclear threat? YAWN
@@Edelweiss-f8c Very dangerous attitude.
It won't "change" anything. This ain't about Ukraine for Biden, rather it's about making Trumps term more difficult.
Lmao another magical game changer. Ukraine had use of numerous domestic missiles that could strike within Russia many more modern than the ATACMS sent to them. They try all the time and yet only a few get through.
Adjust tinfoil hat 😂
Remind me how many men Russia loses each day of the conflict.
No they didn't. Ukraine has been using drones and British and French cruise missiles to strike into Russia. Those systems have much shorter range and smaller warheads than the ATACMS. The fact that Ukraine is still able to slug it out with Russia after nearly 3 years in a war Russia expected to win in three days seems to show that western military aid has been a game changer. You may find that funny,but I doubt all the dead Russia soldiers
killed by western weapons do.
@@MrPurge11 russian forces alone around ~70 a day but your cope is amusing
Tin foil hat ? So the Hrim-2, R-360 Neptune and OTR-21B don't exist in your reality ? Not to mention the Jerry rigged S-75s and S-300s
Trump will stop all this shit
Why so many supoort him
It will change the News Media reports, to more fake News 😂😂😂
BBC people looking super happyy ....
I've never actually this new BBC Opening but the war is likely to get a lot worse if Russia responds... with escalation.
Russia can't respond.
@@proselytizingorthodoxpente8304are you Putin
I hope Trump can end this stupid war
It's very sad that people in Ukraine are losing their life because of these decisions being made way to late.
Doubling down on stupid.
😂
Tentu saja itu akan merubah permainan, yaitu, Rusia menganggap anda sedang berperang melawan mereka, dan kita akan segera melihat wajib militer menimpa para pemuda eropa. Ekonomi hancur dan rakyat menderita di garis depan. Sementara kami melihat kalian di tv. Sunguh menyedihkan
In the first place why will one grab a piece of land from another sovereign state. We should not allow that to happen. Nations should have a right to make their own decisions.
Who are we?
Israel?
The question is what will Russia to back.
Russia: allow me to introduce our ICBM
I feel for the ppl of Ukraine, I really do. But how Zelensky just expects to be bailed out by the other nations is starting to grate on me.
Because Zelinsky knows that defeating Russia in Ukraine and reducing Russian military capabilities is a western military interest.
You have a LOT of patience! Zelensky 'begging' for weapons and money to fight his near neighbour, has been grating on my nerves since the beginning!
Because this is America's proxy war with Russia, Z. has been fawned over and indulged. He isn't even the legitimate President of Ukraine, since 20th? May this year. He is already a very wealthy man, but morally bankrupt.
And I think he will NEVER know a moment 's peace for the rest of his life.
Well, Russia has been bailed out by the west several times too.
@@TheLAGopher Yes that’s the reason why the west bow down to his requests. Plus war is very lucrative. But my point is that he expects it and throws his toys out the pram when he doesn’t get it. Then when he does get it, he wants more!