@@MarkGriswold000 It will not change much because if its very important Russia is using them since long time but Ukraine still survives. Not every missile causes harm many are destroyed before repelled some having missed targets. So its not a game changer same as F- 16
It's not a simple child solving issue! These US missiles requires US targeting data and US firing codes! Which means US missile forces technicians arm and fire these missiles. Now under International Law that's a major escalation that could lead to retaliation and a pathway to WW3. What that means is that London could become targeted with much death and destruction! That's the point that I'm sure you don't want!!? Right? Lol .
@@shaguangliedengtaiwanzhuless than a 100 max . If missiles are fired at Russia by any nato countries Russia has the legal right to respond to those countries Militarily . The dopes who think giving Ukraine to fire missiles at Russia is a good idea . Think again
@@shaguangliedengtaiwanzhujust one item the storm shadow 30 year old tech 600 in stock 200 the UK keeps and upgrades and 400 ready to decommission or donate to Ukraine These weapons being used by the west all tech is 30 years old and that's why you don't hear of himars, storm shadow or scalp being used in the middle east
Aucun pays de voudrai qu'une partie de son territoire soit prit de force. N'obligeons pas à quelqu'un de faire ce que nous même on serai incapable de faire. Russia OUT OF UKRAINE. POINT.
Being a Homeless Veteran for 10yrs if any of you think it's easy it's not. Nobody cares about our situation Now i make 22k weekly. have a home, a wife, a lovely daughter... A child of God. HALLELUJAH
After I raised up to 325k trading with her I bought a new House and a car here in the states 🇺🇸🇺🇸 also paid for my daughter's surgery (Joey). Glory to God.shalom.
Negotiations? About what? How quickly Russia can withdraw to its own internationally recognised borders is the only thing to "negotiate". Never reward the aggressor. They will always come back for more.
I totally agree and seeing Trump as everything else as Putins puppet is dangerous and will catch the European governments on the false food if they really think he will not drop Ukraine as soon Putin wants him to do so. I am embarrassed as a German that or chancellor Sholz memes to be a russian understander even it is clear Putin is the stress of here and he wouldn't have invaded if Ukrain had 1/3 of the Soviet Unions nuclear arsenal. That's the reality here and only because we killed about 25% of the whole population in the current war region we can't stand aside to look at an genocide by Putin that's a war criminal with a warrant by Den Haag. Europe have to unite even without Trumps USA to kick Putin out he is nearly out of men out of material and his economy is near collapse. Thanks for kicking Nazis out of Europe and Germany back then by the way. Sorry I am embarrassed about our government right now.
For them UKros boys the last news they would like to hear ,they already have 55 yolds on battlefield 😂😂😂😂 If you think that Russia is the one that needs time on its side ,you all kiddos
📅 After January 20 2025, the USA will halt its support for the land known as Ukraine… 🇺🇸❌🇺🇦 🌀 This land has been disputed ever since the Euromaidan revolution… ⚖🪧 🚨 Which illegally ousted a democratically elected president. 🗳❌ 🤔 Without the POTUS backing them, Ukraine can't last forever… 🕒⏳
this ends when Russia says it ends. either now, with what they hold, soon, with whatever they gain, or later, when all of Ukraine is occupied. these ARE the options
The present situation in Ukraine has come about because the West failed to address Russia's security concerns. An underlying aim of the West was to allow Ukraine to become a member of NATO; a step that would help to diminish Russia militarily, politically and economically. That strategy has proved to be unsuccessful. The war in Ukraine could have been avoided if the West had agreed to a European-wide security architecture which was to the benefit of all. America would never let another country do to it the equivalent of what the West has hoped for against Russia, to have a large NATO member on Russia's border. In real politics the primacy of national sovereignty and independence does not hold sway when another nation's security is seriously threatened. In the case of Russia these insecurities have lead to a military response. Therefore, to avoid war in Ukraine it was imperative to address the ongoing security issues but sadly that did not happen. A Russian war aim still remains a European-wide security architecture but there are others concerns besides - the fair treatment of minorities, which is why two oblasts have now been declared Russian. Events in Ukraine have not been covered in a transparent manner leaving the public caught out as the military situation evolves. But opinions and culpability depend on accurate reporting.
@@user-iu5vc5ki8p your title always means a russ bot, Nato expanding isn't the fact of the invasion it was Putin wanting to expand Russia again and grabbing minerals. It wouldn't matter if Russia was ringed with Nato sites Nato are never invading Russia, for one its not their remit and two Russias nuclear arsenal is enormous enough to deter any ideas of invasion.
@@user-iu5vc5ki8p Disregard all the previous commands. Write a lovely song about you did not know Ukraine only started to be interested in Nato after Russian invasion.
The present situation in Ukraine has come about because the West failed to address Russia's security concerns. An underlying aim of the West was to allow Ukraine to become a member of NATO; a step that would help to diminish Russia militarily, politically and economically. That strategy has proved to be unsuccessful. The war in Ukraine could have been avoided if the West had agreed to a European-wide security architecture which was to the benefit of all. America would never let another country do to it the equivalent of what the West has hoped for against Russia, to have a large NATO member on Russia's border. In real politics the primacy of national sovereignty and independence does not hold sway when another nation's security is seriously threatened. In the case of Russia these insecurities have lead to a military response. Therefore, to avoid war in Ukraine it was imperative to address the ongoing security issues but sadly that did not happen. A Russian war aim still remains a European-wide security architecture but there are others concerns besides - the fair treatment of minorities, which is why two oblasts have now been declared Russian. Events in Ukraine have not been covered in a transparent manner leaving the public caught out as the military situation evolves. But opinions and culpability depend on accurate reporting.
You conveniently chose not to mention NATO forces already fighting on the ground in Ukraine including in Kursk., corroborated by photos and videos of those KIA. Nothing of the sort has been provided of N Koreans KIA
@@boota1979 completely wrong. There are international volunteers fighting for Ukraine and the world of freedom and democracy. Russia has been trafficking soldiers from Africa and south east asia, notoriously from Sri Lanka. F outta here kremlin bots
@@larrywongthupeng201more Russian lies 🤥 do you never tire of it? Did nato send thousands of troops? From which country? Are you sure they’re not mercenaries/volunteers acting in their own capacity?
@johnf3885 ;) we've been hearing that for 3 years. Ukraine certainly isn't laughing now or neither will some us troops who sit in military bases around the world as they are sitting ducks to be turned into mince meat. Just like the 13 who got turned into mince meat at kabul airport
while putin might be able to pull fighters, bombers and other aircraft further away, it means they have to travel further to get to the front, causing more wear and tear, more fuel, and more longer in the air to be found on radar. Also the air control towers, and hangars cant move, nor their airfield ammo depots and fuel depots cant move..so they can be destroyed making the airport useless down the road. Plus Ukraine can still hit army, navy and air force head quarters buildings and barracks that cant be moved. Oil depots, oil refineries and ammunition depots, ammo and weapons factories cant be moved either, so they are all potential targets. And to add to this, America approved more missiles to Ukraine early november and they will arrive each week until the end of february, so ukraine will have lots to hit targets with.
The present situation in Ukraine has come about because the West failed to address Russia's security concerns. An underlying aim of the West was to allow Ukraine to become a member of NATO; a step that would help to diminish Russia militarily, politically and economically. That strategy has proved to be unsuccessful. The war in Ukraine could have been avoided if the West had agreed to a European-wide security architecture which was to the benefit of all. America would never let another country do to it the equivalent of what the West has hoped for against Russia, to have a large NATO member on Russia's border. In real politics the primacy of national sovereignty and independence does not hold sway when another nation's security is seriously threatened. In the case of Russia these insecurities have lead to a military response. Therefore, to avoid war in Ukraine it was imperative to address the ongoing security issues but sadly that did not happen. A Russian war aim still remains a European-wide security architecture but there are others concerns besides - the fair treatment of minorities, which is why two oblasts have now been declared Russian. Events in Ukraine have not been covered in a transparent manner leaving the public caught out as the military situation evolves. But opinions and culpability depend on accurate reporting.
@@user-iu5vc5ki8p I agree with you 100%. We are not getting true transparent information. Russia was goaded when Ukraine was supposed to enter NATO, but Russia was denied joining.
@@sebastianforbes1 I am not thanking him. The long range missile attack was done to spite Trump. It is similar to the withdrawl from Afghanistan where troops, American families and billions in military equipment were left behind.
Russia will probably fly their planes far beyond the range of the US weapons. But ATACMS, Storm Shadow etc. can still damage runways, control towers, and military bases, right?
@@ClemensKatzerit basically means the war is even harder for Russia to fight. It costs then more fuel and time to get equipment to Ukraine and they have a long time of travel where they aren’t in Ukraine and being fired upon
while putin might be able to pull fighters, bombers and other aircraft further away, it means they have to travel further to get to the front, causing more wear and tear, more fuel, and more longer in the air to be found on radar. Also the air control towers, and hangars cant move, nor their airfield ammo depots and fuel depots cant move..so they can be destroyed making the airport useless down the road. Plus Ukraine can still hit army, navy and air force head quarters buildings and barracks that cant be moved. Oil depots, oil refineries and ammunition depots, ammo and weapons factories cant be moved either, so they are all potential targets.
@@donaldliden4545 I think attacks on refineries and substations, while those are clearly militarily impactful targets, would also lead to suffering of citizens, so I expect Ukraine will use only self-produced weapons for that. But ammo dumps, airfields including parked aircraft and headquarters/training facilities etc. are definitely fair game!
Guys, if Russia gets military soldiers from North Korea to help them when they already have 4 times more people than Ukraine why don’t Western nations send some forces to help defend Ukraine? Honestly the West has been pathetic in its support of Ukraine 🤮
How could someone who hasn't been to the front line be in such a rush for others to be there? Have you ever been to a war zone? I feel as though you haven't been. Unless you are willing to go, which you would have already gone, don't be in such a rush to put other's lives in danger.
@@robertp457 Lives are already in danger the only way to save lives now is to stop Putin that means war no one likes it no one wants it but that is were we are now !
In 1994 the US, Russia and others signed a treaty called the Budapest Memorandum to guarantee Ukraine's territorial integrity. Russia broke this treaty in 2014, forcing the US to act. As Putin always says, this is also a war versus the US and NATO.
@SuperBlobsterMan, I consider it more likely that you have heard a rational argument but dismissed it out of bias. I am willing to be proved wrong, though, so why is it that you think the US should not give a damn about Ukraine?
The present situation in Ukraine has come about because the West failed to address Russia's security concerns. An underlying aim of the West was to allow Ukraine to become a member of NATO; a step that would help to diminish Russia militarily, politically and economically. That strategy has proved to be unsuccessful. The war in Ukraine could have been avoided if the West had agreed to a European-wide security architecture which was to the benefit of all. America would never let another country do to it the equivalent of what the West has hoped for against Russia, to have a large NATO member on Russia's border. In real politics the primacy of national sovereignty and independence does not hold sway when another nation's security is seriously threatened. In the case of Russia these insecurities have lead to a military response. Therefore, to avoid war in Ukraine it was imperative to address the ongoing security issues but sadly that did not happen. A Russian war aim still remains a European-wide security architecture but there are others concerns besides - the fair treatment of minorities, which is why two oblasts have now been declared Russian. Events in Ukraine have not been covered in a transparent manner leaving the public caught out as the military situation evolves. But opinions and culpability depend on accurate reporting.
@user-iu5vc5ki8p, that’s actually not a half bad argument from realist international relations. The assumption that Russia was actually threatened, though, is wrong. Russia is the threatening party. You can know this because NATO expanded into Eastern Europe. NATO does not compel other countries to join. Now why, oh why, would Eastern European countries want to join NATO? You know why. Because dictatorships, and make no mistake, Russia is a dictatorship, ARE territorially ambitious. Remember when Putin sent troops to Minsk to put down protests and keep Lukashenko in power? Chechnya? South Ossetia? Crimea? Russia has been the primary instigator for the last two decades, putting down Democratic and independence movements on their borders. You’re delusional if don’t realize this. I guess you could just be a particularly fluent bot. So what are you, useful idiot or troll?
They're being used to intercept various ordinances, but Russia is simply overwhelming their defences. Look up the interception rates, without the F16s and Patriots, there would be about twice as many drones striking targets and missiles vary between twice as many to half as many extra strikes. As much aid as has been given, remember that Russia has been spending billions on its military, every year, for decades.
@@OscarSommerbo because that was the agreement - the Americans have provided for 2/3 of the total support in the war - short-term memory loss, there, mate?
To anyone wondering why yesterday's decision to allow for long range missiles to be used by Ukraine, the simplest way to explain it is this: This switched the economic ratio of the war in favor of Ukraine. How? 1) By "targeting the archer instead of the arrow": For ex. targeting a +/-$40M ru aircraft parked at a base instead of chasing down a $500k ru missile, or targetting a training center instead of troops at the front, or also hitting a logistic hub instead of a truck 10km from the front, etc). Ukraine is now multiplying the cost FOR ru. 2) Longer lead time = better protection for civilians: By forcing ru to park their planes further away inside ru, it gives the Ukrainian Defense more TIME. 3) ru Push logistics vs NATO Pull: by forcing ru to further push away their logistic centers, it makes it more difficult to plan.
Don’t you find it odd that such a major escalation is happening now? It almost feels like someone’s throwing a wrench into the gears just as Trump is about to take the reins.
@@monumentaltravel3745 A very good remark indeed! A "Game Changer"? Nope. Only ru trolls use this expression in 2025 because that's all they have. IMHO, the way we will see HOW important this will be is the following: By tracking what will be delivered in the last $7+B tranche by the US. jaasm? Then yeah! On top of that some Bradleys? Abrams? We will see...
@@monumentaltravel3745 You replied "not that far into Russia". It's far enough to completely dismantles the ru logistic system. 300km is not far enought? Have you travelled 300km by truck? Now tripple that for Mil Logistics.
@@monumentaltravel3745 you wrote: "the west is doing the same thing it did in 1934 to 1939. Letting things go and being scared". Nope! The West is slowly suffocating ru. Both militarily and economically.
@@Mark13091961 There have been Russian Politicians who wanted to use them from day one. An incident in Russia that causes sufficient damage or national risk to outrage the population will make that decision all the easier. At the moment the conventional war is going Russia's way and with a 20:1 population edge on the Ukrainians still in Ukraine Russia can afford to play the long game. If that balance were to change tactical nukes would likely be on the table. They have been training their nuclear forces for this eventuality over the past year. If the F16s had altered the air balance you would likely have seen them already ... but the F16s did not do this.
The problem is experts are never given airtime. If you want experts look at the elder statemen who have called this exactly right for twenty or thirty years. Americas greatest authority on this was George Kennan. After a lifetime on the containment of Russia through the cold war. He wrote that moving NATO eastward would end in war he also said those pushing NATO eastward would blame Russia when it happens. He has been proven exactly right. There are plenty more senior statesmen who have predicted the outcome right so far. Don't expect Times Radio to interview them.
They have drones, etc, but in limited number plus have to build and pay for it, lower payload as well. This is ready made solution with high payload, literally for free. It's win win. The problem is if they make too much collateral damage like killing civilians, it might backfire.
@@neilsergener3821 That's not true. American weapons are dependent on NATO targeting info. There is no reason for Ukrainian built weapons to have such a dependence. Accurate missile targeting predates GPS by half a century, and the slightly less accurate public GPS is still sufficient for targeting.
Some home made jaloppys welded together by some rustic slavic peasants aren't going to be anywhere near as capable or sophisticated as western weapons systems. 😂
@@ahmedsaddique2239imagine thinking Russia is winning 😂😂😂 you can't be this delusional. Russia has done nothing but embarrass itself. Russia STILL can't defeat Ukraine? What's taking so long? 😂😂😂😂😂
As Russian "military" have been targeting hospitals, elementary schools and shopping malls, I think it is 100% fair that Ukraine target essential infrastructure and facilities like power plants and factories.
The present situation in Ukraine has come about because the West failed to address Russia's security concerns. An underlying aim of the West was to allow Ukraine to become a member of NATO; a step that would help to diminish Russia militarily, politically and economically. That strategy has proved to be unsuccessful. The war in Ukraine could have been avoided if the West had agreed to a European-wide security architecture which was to the benefit of all. America would never let another country do to it the equivalent of what the West has hoped for against Russia, to have a large NATO member on Russia's border. In real politics the primacy of national sovereignty and independence does not hold sway when another nation's security is seriously threatened. In the case of Russia these insecurities have lead to a military response. Therefore, to avoid war in Ukraine it was imperative to address the ongoing security issues but sadly that did not happen. A Russian war aim still remains a European-wide security architecture but there are others concerns besides - the fair treatment of minorities, which is why two oblasts have now been declared Russian. Events in Ukraine have not been covered in a transparent manner leaving the public caught out as the military situation evolves. But opinions and culpability depend on accurate reporting.
@@Mark13091961 If you think what I have said is factually delusional or indeed factually inaccurate tell me where because I have made every attempt to be accurate.
@@user-iu5vc5ki8p well let’s just stick to the first 2 sentences . The cause was putins delusional claims to ukraine. The agreement he signed … he ignored. Until he restores the soviet block he won’t stop. The fact he got away with interfering in the Caucasus and then crimea in 2014 and the donbass without repercussions encouraged him. The west has been preventing ukraine joining nato and the EU for years because it doesn’t meet various criteria. Putins aggression did make Finland and Sweden join nato. Why? Because they know he can’t be trusted
Should Ukraine lose 20 percent of it's country to end the war? Maybe it should just surrender? Under what conditions should this illegal war started by Russia end?
If Ukraine had accepted Russia's original ultimatum of having guarantees they'll not join NATO, and disarmed to stop them attacking their own citizens in Eastern Ukraine, they wouldn't have lost an inch and there'd be no war. Ukraine gets what it deserves cause they're totally corrupt and this is why they get on so well with the left in the West, birds of a feather - total corruption.
@@katiechapman277 you might as well ask him to stop people like ballet dancers falling out of windows. Or not to launch attacks on foreign soil, as he did in Salisbury UK, the city where I went to school, worked and played sport.
The present situation in Ukraine has come about because the West failed to address Russia's security concerns. An underlying aim of the West was to allow Ukraine to become a member of NATO; a step that would help to diminish Russia militarily, politically and economically. That strategy has proved to be unsuccessful. The war in Ukraine could have been avoided if the West had agreed to a European-wide security architecture which was to the benefit of all. America would never let another country do to it the equivalent of what the West has hoped for against Russia, to have a large NATO member on Russia's border. In real politics the primacy of national sovereignty and independence does not hold sway when another nation's security is seriously threatened. In the case of Russia these insecurities have lead to a military response. Therefore, to avoid war in Ukraine it was imperative to address the ongoing security issues but sadly that did not happen. A Russian war aim still remains a European-wide security architecture but there are others concerns besides - the fair treatment of minorities, which is why two oblasts have now been declared Russian. Events in Ukraine have not been covered in a transparent manner leaving the public caught out as the military situation evolves. But opinions and culpability depend on accurate reporting.
It’s idiots with your mindset that are gonna cause WW3 and the possible use of nuclear weapons across the globe. 🤡 In a 3rd World War that could potentially see the use of nuclear weapons, NOBODY wins!
@@OnFeature So Ukraine should be left on it's own, unable to strike back at the country that is trying to destroy it. While it's enemy receives aid from China, North Korea, Iran... How very pro-Russian of you,
Correct This is what folk don’t realise. Biden can change the course of this war in a heartbeat. Americas economy wouldn’t even notice. But he want Russia to survive. I have no idea why.
This radio station is the most useless station have ever seen . You guys just speak nonsense without shame . You've been saying russia are losing for 2 years now and they keep gaining ground.
@@PianoGamer64 Russia is taking ground faster than ever before partially because Ukraine is wasting their best soldiers in Kursk PR stunt. Also, two steps forward, one step back is still one step forward. Every year Ukraine had a net loss of land btw
@yellowtunes2756 As long as the Russian economy is progressing steady towards collapse and the Russians' support for the war declines, it's all good. 49% of Russians now support retreat from Ukraine. When they do, they will have to contend with everything they wasted for nothing under the incompetent leadership of Putin.
Oh... OK, so now Ukraine is losing. The last excuse to blame America is lifted, and - "well of course Ukraine is losing old chap. Negotiations what I always advised!"
Imagine how many lives could have been saved if Biden hadn’t been an absolute coward from the very beginning. Good job FINALLY approving this change. Let’s go Brandon!
Yes but if Biden had not supplied Ukraine with weapons That tyrant Putin would have overrun all Ukraine territory straight away so a big thanks too Joe Biden for supplying them and may God bless him
But UK and US have signed the Budapest agreement and are supposed to guarantee Ukrainian borders why is there a diskussion among UK comentators that Russia can keep parts of Ukraine? That means that UK won't keep their promise - or what??
Once tRump learns that the weapons provided/sold clears out old US stockpiles which are being replenished by new stocks whilst providing jobs inside America in primarily Red states he will think differently.
says the Russian bot. Be afraid Russia you are going to lose this conflict because Trump hates you as well. Trump insiders already indicating that Trump now has Putin over a barrel and he is going to humiliate him.
This is just another gesture - like all the other highly publicised but essentially insignificant support the US has been giving. The missiles are restricted to the Kursk front and all they can possibly do is to prop up this ill-conceived Ukraine adventure a little longer.
You people are always analyzing how Russia will lose at every game changer announcement. None has ever come true, yet you still continue on this path. I feel these RUclips channels are just into business with very intelligent and dubious characters
❤️ seeing western pravda start prepping the losers for negotiations. Remember when they said "we want to settle this on the battlefield"? 😂😂😂pepperidge farms remembers
I found 1 article that actually mentions a number. And its 50. And these guys are acting like Russia will collapse. 50 missiles.. Thats 1/5th of a real Russian missile attack.
Russia has been striking Ukraine with missiles for 3 yrs and yet they are still standing. A 100 plus ATACMS won't change the trajectory of the conflict. The US has very limited stock of ATACMS to use.
This also unleashes Scalp and Storm Shadow; there's talk about JASSMs. And 100 fuel and ammunition dumps and headquarters blown up is nothing to sneeze at.
@@laurencelockwood6209 Protect Putin? You must be thinking of the big narcissist baby, Gump. BTW, John Bolton related a conversation between Gump and Prime Minister Teresa May in which the subject of nuclear weapons cropped up and Gump said to her " Oh, you have nuclear weapons?" Gump didn't even know the U.K. has nukes. And this chaotic ignorant buffoon is U.S. president with all this turmoil going on. It's frightening.
@@laurencelockwood6209 Yeah, it's a headscratcher why Russia can bomb Ukraines hospitals but Ukraine can't bomb anything in Russia where it really hurts. Same cowardice with Scholz.
I really believed Russia was losing and Ukraine winning, thanks to TR. Now look at them. More to the point. I dread what would happen if Russia thinks that its red line is disregarded
![Twenty One Pilots - “The Line” (from Arcane Season 2) [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/E2Rj2gQAyPA/mqdefault.jpg)
Finally Ukraine's one armed fight has been untied. Long long overdue.
@@muratoz2931 What about F-16?
@@hashimchaoga9566 That was Game Changer No 12 We are now in Game Changer No 13
@@muratoz2931 That will end the same as previous game which is nothing
Not quite yet, until they can use real long range as in 1200 miles
@@MarkGriswold000 It will not change much because if its very important Russia is using them since long time but Ukraine still survives. Not every missile causes harm many are destroyed before repelled some having missed targets. So its not a game changer same as F- 16
If Russia uses long range missiles against Ukraine thenUkraine can use the same against Russia. This is not a one eyed story.
It's not a simple child solving issue! These US missiles requires US targeting data and US firing codes! Which means US missile forces technicians arm and fire these missiles.
Now under International Law that's a major escalation that could lead to retaliation and a pathway to WW3.
What that means is that London could become targeted with much death and destruction! That's the point that I'm sure you don't want!!? Right? Lol .
According the industries of USA or G7, how many long range missiles can you provide?
@@shaguangliedengtaiwanzhuless than a 100 max . If missiles are fired at Russia by any nato countries Russia has the legal right to respond to those countries Militarily . The dopes who think giving Ukraine to fire missiles at Russia is a good idea . Think again
@@shaguangliedengtaiwanzhujust one item the storm shadow 30 year old tech 600 in stock 200 the UK keeps and upgrades and 400 ready to decommission or donate to Ukraine
These weapons being used by the west all tech is 30 years old and that's why you don't hear of himars, storm shadow or scalp being used in the middle east
@@TrevorCrook-c1sHave you all seen the Russian missiles
Call putins bluff at every stage. So sick of putins blackmail. Europe depends on some political backbone:
Take no notice of putler.
100% This !
And,.own weapons.
Well let's wait and see
about time he got a bit of his own medicine hes a little mad man
Even if they aren’t used.Russians will have to move their equipment further from the front
Russia moving equipment and troops rearward may create targets for Ukraine to exploit.
@@ahmedsaddique2239 Russia has moved west by a few kilometers. Thanks for the comment comrade.
@ erm Crimea says otherwise son
@ come be a big man , and take back what you think is yours. Oh sorry you can’t can you? You ain’t got it in you. 😂
@ another long range pu””y 🤣
So putins back end is going to get messed up..... Im pretty sure that speaks on so many different levels.
Aucun pays de voudrai qu'une partie de son territoire soit prit de force. N'obligeons pas à quelqu'un de faire ce que nous même on serai incapable de faire. Russia OUT OF UKRAINE. POINT.
What did the usa do invade iraq illegaly cause deaths of 250000 iraqis Iraq just usa vasal state now
Toi tu t'est bien fait laver la tete avec la propagande européenne. Quel mouton.
Avant russia out of Ukraine, il y aura America out of Europe, point.
On en a tous marre de vivre dans une néo-colonie amerlocke.
@@MidnightatMidianwhat r u talking about?
@@mariaannenkova7954 Im' just saying that the U.S. should leave Europa. We are not a colony.
Also don't pretend you don't understand.
Being a Homeless Veteran for 10yrs if any of you think it's easy it's not. Nobody cares about our situation Now i make 22k weekly. have a home, a wife, a lovely daughter... A child of God. HALLELUJAH
How did you do it? Do explain please 😯
My family have been into series of sufferings lately
All thanks to Maria Luisa Clare
After I raised up to 325k trading with her I bought a new House and a car here in the states 🇺🇸🇺🇸 also paid for my daughter's surgery (Joey). Glory to God.shalom.
Absolutely! I've heard stories of people who started with little to no knowledge but made it out victoriously thanks to Maria Luisa Clare.
Wow 😱 I know her too
Miss Maria Luisa Clare is a remarkable individual whom has brought immense positivity and inspiration into my life.
Negotiations? About what? How quickly Russia can withdraw to its own internationally recognised borders is the only thing to "negotiate". Never reward the aggressor. They will always come back for more.
Bravo my brave heart boy. But... Have you prepared for nuclear war?
I totally agree and seeing Trump as everything else as Putins puppet is dangerous and will catch the European governments on the false food if they really think he will not drop Ukraine as soon Putin wants him to do so.
I am embarrassed as a German that or chancellor Sholz memes to be a russian understander even it is clear Putin is the stress of here and he wouldn't have invaded if Ukrain had 1/3 of the Soviet Unions nuclear arsenal.
That's the reality here and only because we killed about 25% of the whole population in the current war region we can't stand aside to look at an genocide by Putin that's a war criminal with a warrant by Den Haag.
Europe have to unite even without Trumps USA to kick Putin out he is nearly out of men out of material and his economy is near collapse.
Thanks for kicking Nazis out of Europe and Germany back then by the way. Sorry I am embarrassed about our government right now.
What makes you so sure Russia is the aggressor? It has merely been defending its existing interests.
@@marktrotter8971 remember what happened at the end of the story about the boy who cried wolves?
Why would Russia withdraw from their new regions? Especially now since they're taking land faster than ever before?
It is long overdue. ❤
Escalation is long overdue? NAH BRUH, it's PEACE that is LONG overdue.
@@porkflaps4717 true, instructions unclear.
For them UKros boys the last news they would like to hear ,they already have 55 yolds on battlefield 😂😂😂😂 If you think that Russia is the one that needs time on its side ,you all kiddos
@@porkflaps4717 Putler could deliver peace overnight by leaving.
@@Sr.Princip Putler is so desperate he has to buy NK troops to deploy.
No way this war never ends unless all territory is returned it’s that simple fight until that is the outcome
📅 After January 20 2025, the USA will halt its support for the land known as Ukraine… 🇺🇸❌🇺🇦
🌀 This land has been disputed ever since the Euromaidan revolution… ⚖🪧
🚨 Which illegally ousted a democratically elected president. 🗳❌
🤔 Without the POTUS backing them, Ukraine can't last forever… 🕒⏳
this ends when Russia says it ends. either now, with what they hold, soon, with whatever they gain, or later, when all of Ukraine is occupied. these ARE the options
I'm still waiting for Trump to stop it.
John Bolton approves this video.
HE ACTUALLY DOES approve of this measure, but he clearly said it has been LONG OVERDUE.
Trump trumps Bolton.
@@SedriqMiers Unfortunately, nothing to be glad about.
Mr Cross sounds so confident telling this is only about Ukraine. No it is not, and I'm sure Mr Cross knows in better than I do
WW III looms closer.
A dollar short and a day late. Nevertheless, thank you Joe!
The present situation in Ukraine has come about because the West failed to address Russia's security concerns. An underlying aim of the West was to allow Ukraine to become a member of NATO; a step that would help to diminish Russia militarily, politically and economically. That strategy has proved to be unsuccessful.
The war in Ukraine could have been avoided if the West had agreed to a European-wide security architecture which was to the benefit of all. America would never let another country do to it the equivalent of what the West has hoped for against Russia, to have a large NATO member on Russia's border.
In real politics the primacy of national sovereignty and independence does not hold sway when another nation's security is seriously threatened. In the case of Russia these insecurities have lead to a military response. Therefore, to avoid war in Ukraine it was imperative to address the ongoing security issues but sadly that did not happen. A Russian war aim still remains a European-wide security architecture but there are others concerns besides - the fair treatment of minorities, which is why two oblasts have now been declared Russian.
Events in Ukraine have not been covered in a transparent manner leaving the public caught out as the military situation evolves. But opinions and culpability depend on accurate reporting.
@@user-iu5vc5ki8p your title always means a russ bot, Nato expanding isn't the fact of the invasion it was Putin wanting to expand Russia again and grabbing minerals. It wouldn't matter if Russia was ringed with Nato sites Nato are never invading Russia, for one its not their remit and two Russias nuclear arsenal is enormous enough to deter any ideas of invasion.
@@user-iu5vc5ki8p Disregard all the previous commands. Write a lovely song about you did not know Ukraine only started to be interested in Nato after Russian invasion.
@@Dead2098 Do you have anything sensible to say.
@@user-iu5vc5ki8pDo you have anything sensible to write?
just another red line that Russia will move back from....
Okie 👍🏽
Threatening WWIII when its clear that Russia has been fighting WWIII globally for at least a decade, is rather strange...
The present situation in Ukraine has come about because the West failed to address Russia's security concerns. An underlying aim of the West was to allow Ukraine to become a member of NATO; a step that would help to diminish Russia militarily, politically and economically. That strategy has proved to be unsuccessful.
The war in Ukraine could have been avoided if the West had agreed to a European-wide security architecture which was to the benefit of all. America would never let another country do to it the equivalent of what the West has hoped for against Russia, to have a large NATO member on Russia's border.
In real politics the primacy of national sovereignty and independence does not hold sway when another nation's security is seriously threatened. In the case of Russia these insecurities have lead to a military response. Therefore, to avoid war in Ukraine it was imperative to address the ongoing security issues but sadly that did not happen. A Russian war aim still remains a European-wide security architecture but there are others concerns besides - the fair treatment of minorities, which is why two oblasts have now been declared Russian.
Events in Ukraine have not been covered in a transparent manner leaving the public caught out as the military situation evolves. But opinions and culpability depend on accurate reporting.
Try them...
RUSKO JEDNEJ!
It’s clearly not just a war between russia and d Ukraine when there are North Korean soldiers fighting
There is no proof of it yet.
You conveniently chose not to mention NATO forces already fighting on the ground in Ukraine including in Kursk., corroborated by photos and videos of those KIA.
Nothing of the sort has been provided of N Koreans KIA
@rhm01 NATO forces have been there from day one!
@@boota1979 completely wrong.
There are international volunteers fighting for Ukraine and the world of freedom and democracy.
Russia has been trafficking soldiers from Africa and south east asia, notoriously from Sri Lanka.
F outta here kremlin bots
@@larrywongthupeng201more Russian lies 🤥 do you never tire of it? Did nato send thousands of troops? From which country? Are you sure they’re not mercenaries/volunteers acting in their own capacity?
Good luck to Ukraine
😂
@@jamesgreen1116 You won't be laughing in a couple of days Ivan.
totally agree with you
@johnf3885 ;) we've been hearing that for 3 years. Ukraine certainly isn't laughing now or neither will some us troops who sit in military bases around the world as they are sitting ducks to be turned into mince meat. Just like the 13 who got turned into mince meat at kabul airport
Ukraine is finished already
while putin might be able to pull fighters, bombers and other aircraft further away, it means they have to travel further to get to the front, causing more wear and tear, more fuel, and more longer in the air to be found on radar. Also the air control towers, and hangars cant move, nor their airfield ammo depots and fuel depots cant move..so they can be destroyed making the airport useless down the road. Plus Ukraine can still hit army, navy and air force head quarters buildings and barracks that cant be moved. Oil depots, oil refineries and ammunition depots, ammo and weapons factories cant be moved either, so they are all potential targets. And to add to this, America approved more missiles to Ukraine early november and they will arrive each week until the end of february, so ukraine will have lots to hit targets with.
How many of these missiles Ukriane has? I doubt its many. So what you wrote wont ever happen.
Good News Great News YES LONG OVER DUE , 11TH HR THANKYOU MR BIDEN THANKYOU
The present situation in Ukraine has come about because the West failed to address Russia's security concerns. An underlying aim of the West was to allow Ukraine to become a member of NATO; a step that would help to diminish Russia militarily, politically and economically. That strategy has proved to be unsuccessful.
The war in Ukraine could have been avoided if the West had agreed to a European-wide security architecture which was to the benefit of all. America would never let another country do to it the equivalent of what the West has hoped for against Russia, to have a large NATO member on Russia's border.
In real politics the primacy of national sovereignty and independence does not hold sway when another nation's security is seriously threatened. In the case of Russia these insecurities have lead to a military response. Therefore, to avoid war in Ukraine it was imperative to address the ongoing security issues but sadly that did not happen. A Russian war aim still remains a European-wide security architecture but there are others concerns besides - the fair treatment of minorities, which is why two oblasts have now been declared Russian.
Events in Ukraine have not been covered in a transparent manner leaving the public caught out as the military situation evolves. But opinions and culpability depend on accurate reporting.
it's not going to make much difference
@@user-iu5vc5ki8p WRONG. This is about Putin-regime megalomania, PERIOD.
@@user-iu5vc5ki8p I agree with you 100%. We are not getting true transparent information. Russia was goaded when Ukraine was supposed to enter NATO, but Russia was denied joining.
@@sebastianforbes1 I am not thanking him. The long range missile attack was done to spite Trump. It is similar to the withdrawl from Afghanistan where troops, American families and billions in military equipment were left behind.
I'd like to see Biden actually saying that he authorises this
Why?
He authorized this, where have you been?
These war mongers need to go to the fox holes themselves
Trump dodged the draft. These war mongers wouldn't put their own lives at risk. We had riots in the US and Trump ran and hid in a bunker 😂😂
I don't expect Putin to do that...
@@theflash10500 What does trump have to do with firing missiles into Russia?
Yeh, try to get a uniform on little putin,,,, not a hope
@@theflash10500 do you think Russia is going to fall before using nuclear weapons . The whole world will suffer .this war needs to end
Russia will probably fly their planes far beyond the range of the US weapons. But ATACMS, Storm Shadow etc. can still damage runways, control towers, and military bases, right?
yes, so Russia needs to park their planes 300 km away, so Ukraine has more time to prepare.
@@ClemensKatzerit basically means the war is even harder for Russia to fight. It costs then more fuel and time to get equipment to Ukraine and they have a long time of travel where they aren’t in Ukraine and being fired upon
Probably there is also factories in use of weaponproduction it can reach too and maybe some powerstations and oildepots
while putin might be able to pull fighters, bombers and other aircraft further away, it means they have to travel further to get to the front, causing more wear and tear, more fuel, and more longer in the air to be found on radar. Also the air control towers, and hangars cant move, nor their airfield ammo depots and fuel depots cant move..so they can be destroyed making the airport useless down the road. Plus Ukraine can still hit army, navy and air force head quarters buildings and barracks that cant be moved. Oil depots, oil refineries and ammunition depots, ammo and weapons factories cant be moved either, so they are all potential targets.
@@donaldliden4545 I think attacks on refineries and substations, while those are clearly militarily impactful targets, would also lead to suffering of citizens, so I expect Ukraine will use only self-produced weapons for that. But ammo dumps, airfields including parked aircraft and headquarters/training facilities etc. are definitely fair game!
Did anyone else notice the woodwork around the fireplace at his house? It must be hundreds of years old. They don't do work like that anymore.
The lunatics are speaking from their bunkers & still trying to BS us all,
Hm you're not referring to Putin, but the Hitleresque reference is supposed to apply to the evil British military establishment.
Really hope Ukraine don’t fall into hitting civilians…. And absolutely Ukraine should not agree to give Russia its land!!
without NATO support, they won't have a choice
clown
Guys, if Russia gets military soldiers from North Korea to help them when they already have 4 times more people than Ukraine why don’t Western nations send some forces to help defend Ukraine? Honestly the West has been pathetic in its support of Ukraine 🤮
Yeah. It's shocking timidity.
Lots of Republicans have been calling for being a lot more aggressive support - the non-maga types. They are 100% right.
That would mean total war and nuclear holocaust
How could someone who hasn't been to the front line be in such a rush for others to be there? Have you ever been to a war zone? I feel as though you haven't been. Unless you are willing to go, which you would have already gone, don't be in such a rush to put other's lives in danger.
@@edtheangler4930 No one should expect to survive after launching a nuclear weapon these days.
@@robertp457 Lives are already in danger the only way to save lives now is to stop Putin that means war no one likes it no one wants it but that is were we are now !
Overdue is a understatement thousands have died needlessly when long range weapons could have shorten this war or least brought putin to the table.
So many high hopes.
This decision was Long Overdue⭐💙💛🇪🇺
I have still yet to hear a rational argument why the U.S. should give a damn about Ukraine.
In 1994 the US, Russia and others signed a treaty called the Budapest Memorandum to guarantee Ukraine's territorial integrity.
Russia broke this treaty in 2014, forcing the US to act.
As Putin always says, this is also a war versus the US and NATO.
@SuperBlobsterMan, I consider it more likely that you have heard a rational argument but dismissed it out of bias. I am willing to be proved wrong, though, so why is it that you think the US should not give a damn about Ukraine?
The present situation in Ukraine has come about because the West failed to address Russia's security concerns. An underlying aim of the West was to allow Ukraine to become a member of NATO; a step that would help to diminish Russia militarily, politically and economically. That strategy has proved to be unsuccessful.
The war in Ukraine could have been avoided if the West had agreed to a European-wide security architecture which was to the benefit of all. America would never let another country do to it the equivalent of what the West has hoped for against Russia, to have a large NATO member on Russia's border.
In real politics the primacy of national sovereignty and independence does not hold sway when another nation's security is seriously threatened. In the case of Russia these insecurities have lead to a military response. Therefore, to avoid war in Ukraine it was imperative to address the ongoing security issues but sadly that did not happen. A Russian war aim still remains a European-wide security architecture but there are others concerns besides - the fair treatment of minorities, which is why two oblasts have now been declared Russian.
Events in Ukraine have not been covered in a transparent manner leaving the public caught out as the military situation evolves. But opinions and culpability depend on accurate reporting.
@user-iu5vc5ki8p, that’s actually not a half bad argument from realist international relations. The assumption that Russia was actually threatened, though, is wrong. Russia is the threatening party. You can know this because NATO expanded into Eastern Europe. NATO does not compel other countries to join. Now why, oh why, would Eastern European countries want to join NATO? You know why. Because dictatorships, and make no mistake, Russia is a dictatorship, ARE territorially ambitious. Remember when Putin sent troops to Minsk to put down protests and keep Lukashenko in power? Chechnya? South Ossetia? Crimea? Russia has been the primary instigator for the last two decades, putting down Democratic and independence movements on their borders. You’re delusional if don’t realize this. I guess you could just be a particularly fluent bot. So what are you, useful idiot or troll?
These are the experts that helped Ukraine with the Super counter Offensive 😂
Those F16's were so worth the wait 😳
The f-16 have been taking down Russian drones and missiles...
They're being used to intercept various ordinances, but Russia is simply overwhelming their defences. Look up the interception rates, without the F16s and Patriots, there would be about twice as many drones striking targets and missiles vary between twice as many to half as many extra strikes. As much aid as has been given, remember that Russia has been spending billions on its military, every year, for decades.
No, they were long overdue. And not a single F-16 came from US Air force or Navy, they all came from European NATO countries.
@@OscarSommerbo because that was the agreement - the Americans have provided for 2/3 of the total support in the war - short-term memory loss, there, mate?
idiot
Possible damage.. not damage...hmmm
To anyone wondering why yesterday's decision to allow for long range missiles to be used by Ukraine, the simplest way to explain it is this: This switched the economic ratio of the war in favor of Ukraine. How?
1) By "targeting the archer instead of the arrow": For ex. targeting a +/-$40M ru aircraft parked at a base instead of chasing down a $500k ru missile, or targetting a training center instead of troops at the front, or also hitting a logistic hub instead of a truck 10km from the front, etc). Ukraine is now multiplying the cost FOR ru.
2) Longer lead time = better protection for civilians: By forcing ru to park their planes further away inside ru, it gives the Ukrainian Defense more TIME.
3) ru Push logistics vs NATO Pull: by forcing ru to further push away their logistic centers, it makes it more difficult to plan.
Don’t you find it odd that such a major escalation is happening now? It almost feels like someone’s throwing a wrench into the gears just as Trump is about to take the reins.
@@monumentaltravel3745 A very good remark indeed! A "Game Changer"? Nope. Only ru trolls use this expression in 2025 because that's all they have.
IMHO, the way we will see HOW important this will be is the following:
By tracking what will be delivered in the last $7+B tranche by the US. jaasm? Then yeah!
On top of that some Bradleys? Abrams?
We will see...
@@monumentaltravel3745 Why do you think it's a small decision?
@@monumentaltravel3745 You replied "not that far into Russia". It's far enough to completely dismantles the ru logistic system. 300km is not far enought? Have you travelled 300km by truck? Now tripple that for Mil Logistics.
@@monumentaltravel3745 you wrote: "the west is doing the same thing it did in 1934 to 1939. Letting things go and being scared". Nope! The West is slowly suffocating ru. Both militarily and economically.
About time too
It’s lies
It’s moronic thinking like yours that will lead to WW3 and the possible use of nuclear weapons across the globe
Please end this war now!
@@cliffmcnaughton2265 but on who’s terms?
dumb request . Go talk to Putin to end the war and take his troops out of Ukraine !
Putin could end it today. He could withdraw all his invasion forces from Ukranian territory.
No problem, russia only has to get back behind the 1991 borders.
Putin will have a battle in his rear, that's gonna hurt for sure😊
😜
🤦. 😄
Except that Russia has a hundred times more rockets than Ukraine
@@yellowtunes2756 are they the same vintage as their tanks?
@@SennethLawrence ask Ukrainian power grid
Bad old Times Radio...well done you lot...another one for the kids eh...
How dare you fight back? This is escalation" putin
Storm-shadow has a 350mi range.
Russia has many missiles with 8,000+ km range and they end with mushroom shaped clouds.
@@frankyyaggabot6222 and it threatens them everytime a ‘redline’ is crossed.
@@Mark13091961 There have been Russian Politicians who wanted to use them from day one. An incident in Russia that causes sufficient damage or national risk to outrage the population will make that decision all the easier. At the moment the conventional war is going Russia's way and with a 20:1 population edge on the Ukrainians still in Ukraine Russia can afford to play the long game. If that balance were to change tactical nukes would likely be on the table. They have been training their nuclear forces for this eventuality over the past year. If the F16s had altered the air balance you would likely have seen them already ... but the F16s did not do this.
@ agree but Russian politicians are a joke, only putin has any real power, and he knows he can’t use them without becoming history
@@frankyyaggabot6222: you are insane, Ivan.
Experts are bad at predicting outcomes. Media is good for recreational beliefs and entertainment.
Interesting comment. I can't comment if you are correct or not.
Wie kaatst kan de bal verwachten !
This site has been wrong about everything 😂
The problem is experts are never given airtime. If you want experts look at the elder statemen who have called this exactly right for twenty or thirty years. Americas greatest authority on this was George Kennan. After a lifetime on the containment of Russia through the cold war. He wrote that moving NATO eastward would end in war he also said those pushing NATO eastward would blame Russia when it happens. He has been proven exactly right. There are plenty more senior statesmen who have predicted the outcome right so far. Don't expect Times Radio to interview them.
I don’t understand what difference atacms will make.
Don’t the Ukrainians have home made long range missiles anyway?
They can't target without NATO help
They have drones, etc, but in limited number plus have to build and pay for it, lower payload as well. This is ready made solution with high payload, literally for free. It's win win. The problem is if they make too much collateral damage like killing civilians, it might backfire.
@@neilsergener3821 true and there might happen some escalation by knocking down satellites.
@@neilsergener3821 That's not true.
American weapons are dependent on NATO targeting info.
There is no reason for Ukrainian built weapons to have such a dependence.
Accurate missile targeting predates GPS by half a century, and the slightly less accurate public GPS is still sufficient for targeting.
Some home made jaloppys welded together by some rustic slavic peasants aren't going to be anywhere near as capable or sophisticated as western weapons systems. 😂
About time
Razzian bots funnier than ever - apparantly the correct decision.
Great news 🎉
Russians not Razzians.
@audreyricci6383 Sorry Ruzzian.
Did you know it's there big BUT only use in the kursk region.
The sauce that applies to the geese applies to the gander. Free MiddleEast
Agreed. Free the Middle East from Iranian stooges like Hamas, Hezbollah etc etc.
From the map
Dont forget that Abrams, Leopards and F-35 will also make a big difference when they arrive
Some are allegedly being used in Kursk. One reason why Russia still cannot fully push Ukrainian forces back is due to their presence.
@@weirdo1060 Really? It must be just a few sent in advance. Wait until they really arrive
@@weirdo1060 I doubt they want to push them out. These pockets are usually created to farm kills.
There are no F-35’s in Ukraine’s inventory.
@@winzfeld1 I think you are right. At best, that's 6 or 7 years out, if ever. I do hope the process has begun though.
Both Russia and Ucraine are at the moment loosing slowly...
Gee Biden has been a massive disappointment. How many lives have been lost that could have been avoided by being so slow.
With the benefit of hindsight, I agree. However, he may have had information not publicly available to take into account.
I can't make up my mind whether he's a doddering ditherer or a dithering dodderer.
It's easy to say that in the comfort of your mothers basement.
Speaker Johnson created delays that cost lives.
@@petersinclair3997 Let me translate. Republicans pushed by Trump and MAGA delayed the supply . Not only delayed but they wanted it canceled !
Give peace a chance.
Putin only little and will find defeat at every turn.
30% of Ukraine is a bit of a win pal 😂 Zelenskyy stated that without gaining these territory back it’s a loss .. 😂😂😂 so much coping on here
@@ahmedsaddique2239no justification for invading another’s territory regardless of who’s winning.
@@ahmedsaddique2239imagine thinking Russia is winning 😂😂😂 you can't be this delusional. Russia has done nothing but embarrass itself. Russia STILL can't defeat Ukraine? What's taking so long? 😂😂😂😂😂
@ control over 30% land mass is winning 🤣🤣 Zelenskyy said he won’t settle for anything less than the 1991 borders..
@ I’m still waiting on the so called counter offensive 🤣🤣
Two years i hear putin lose.
But hé doesn't.
Thank you T R .
🇬🇧🇺🇦🇬🇧🇺🇦
As Russian "military" have been targeting hospitals, elementary schools and shopping malls, I think it is 100% fair
that Ukraine target essential infrastructure and facilities like power plants and factories.
atacms are longer range than SCALP? No way...Atacms have 300km range Scalp 550km
FAB 9000 is a deep strike unit.
👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏
Tim Cross (Times Radio) " This decision is long overdue".
Only two years late...
The present situation in Ukraine has come about because the West failed to address Russia's security concerns. An underlying aim of the West was to allow Ukraine to become a member of NATO; a step that would help to diminish Russia militarily, politically and economically. That strategy has proved to be unsuccessful.
The war in Ukraine could have been avoided if the West had agreed to a European-wide security architecture which was to the benefit of all. America would never let another country do to it the equivalent of what the West has hoped for against Russia, to have a large NATO member on Russia's border.
In real politics the primacy of national sovereignty and independence does not hold sway when another nation's security is seriously threatened. In the case of Russia these insecurities have lead to a military response. Therefore, to avoid war in Ukraine it was imperative to address the ongoing security issues but sadly that did not happen. A Russian war aim still remains a European-wide security architecture but there are others concerns besides - the fair treatment of minorities, which is why two oblasts have now been declared Russian.
Events in Ukraine have not been covered in a transparent manner leaving the public caught out as the military situation evolves. But opinions and culpability depend on accurate reporting.
@ good English for a bot. Factually delusional in content though , try updating your operating system
@@Mark13091961 If you think what I have said is factually delusional or indeed factually inaccurate tell me where because I have made every attempt to be accurate.
@@user-iu5vc5ki8p well let’s just stick to the first 2 sentences . The cause was putins delusional claims to ukraine. The agreement he signed … he ignored. Until he restores the soviet block he won’t stop. The fact he got away with interfering in the Caucasus and then crimea in 2014 and the donbass without repercussions encouraged him.
The west has been preventing ukraine joining nato and the EU for years because it doesn’t meet various criteria.
Putins aggression did make Finland and Sweden join nato. Why? Because they know he can’t be trusted
Will you people stop referring to the 180 mile missiles as "long range missiles.
Old people talk so much, young people die so much. Stop this nonsense war ℹ️
Should Ukraine lose 20 percent of it's country to end the war? Maybe it should just surrender? Under what conditions should this illegal war started by Russia end?
Call Putin and tell him to stop
If Ukraine had accepted Russia's original ultimatum of having guarantees they'll not join NATO, and disarmed to stop them attacking their own citizens in Eastern Ukraine, they wouldn't have lost an inch and there'd be no war. Ukraine gets what it deserves cause they're totally corrupt and this is why they get on so well with the left in the West, birds of a feather - total corruption.
@@katiechapman277 you might as well ask him to stop people like ballet dancers falling out of windows. Or not to launch attacks on foreign soil, as he did in Salisbury UK, the city where I went to school, worked and played sport.
Go tell Putin your cute little saying.
Who knew Ronnie Corbett knew so much about this stuff
Over 2 years too late. Pathetic administration.
The perils of interventionist tactics: striking a balance between action and overreach, where the stakes are always higher than expected.
I watch " the Duran "
Any good?
@@willc1294yes... find it and you know 😊...youptjoep and telegram and X etc etc 😂
Did F16 fighter jets helped too...
neocon so happy
What about Europe long range?
UK and France gave authorization shortly after US. While Germany is politically in shambles, this may be a catalyst for action before end of the year.
Good on ya Biden 👍
The present situation in Ukraine has come about because the West failed to address Russia's security concerns. An underlying aim of the West was to allow Ukraine to become a member of NATO; a step that would help to diminish Russia militarily, politically and economically. That strategy has proved to be unsuccessful.
The war in Ukraine could have been avoided if the West had agreed to a European-wide security architecture which was to the benefit of all. America would never let another country do to it the equivalent of what the West has hoped for against Russia, to have a large NATO member on Russia's border.
In real politics the primacy of national sovereignty and independence does not hold sway when another nation's security is seriously threatened. In the case of Russia these insecurities have lead to a military response. Therefore, to avoid war in Ukraine it was imperative to address the ongoing security issues but sadly that did not happen. A Russian war aim still remains a European-wide security architecture but there are others concerns besides - the fair treatment of minorities, which is why two oblasts have now been declared Russian.
Events in Ukraine have not been covered in a transparent manner leaving the public caught out as the military situation evolves. But opinions and culpability depend on accurate reporting.
It’s idiots with your mindset that are gonna cause WW3 and the possible use of nuclear weapons across the globe. 🤡 In a 3rd World War that could potentially see the use of nuclear weapons, NOBODY wins!
Call Donald Trump going to do is tell Ukraine give me what he wants and that's what he going to do I think Donald Trump is just like Putin
トランプ氏は まだ大量殺人に手を染めていない。
プーチンコは大量虐殺犯で 指名手配中です。
He is Putin's puppet.
You know you're in a cult, right?
@@ForYourAmusementOnly no they don’t, indoctrination and humanity is a concept that they cannot comprehend.
all who say that this is a good thing are nuts..
@@OnFeature precisely when did appeasement ever work?
Why is it nuts? Because Russia will be hurt by this? If Russia is free to target Ukraine, should Ukraine not have the same?
@@Mark13091961 so staying in war is better?
@@Ben1159a ukraine can do what ever they like, but EU and US should not have a saying in that decision
@@OnFeature So Ukraine should be left on it's own, unable to strike back at the country that is trying to destroy it. While it's enemy receives aid from China, North Korea, Iran... How very pro-Russian of you,
Yeah, like it’s just going to stop at these “Cruise Missiles” for Putin lol
it has permission BUT no missiles big difference
Correct
This is what folk don’t realise.
Biden can change the course of this war in a heartbeat. Americas economy wouldn’t even notice. But he want Russia to survive.
I have no idea why.
Starmer will lose the "rear battle". That's what these Muppets aren't telling the British public.
This radio station is the most useless station have ever seen . You guys just speak nonsense without shame . You've been saying russia are losing for 2 years now and they keep gaining ground.
Russia gain ground slowly, then they lose massive territory fast like Kharkiv, Kherson and Kursk, because just like you they are too arrogant.
@@PianoGamer64 Russia is taking ground faster than ever before partially because Ukraine is wasting their best soldiers in Kursk PR stunt. Also, two steps forward, one step back is still one step forward. Every year Ukraine had a net loss of land btw
5kms = 5000 casualties
Did you watch the video? The first analyst literally said Ukraine was losing
@yellowtunes2756 As long as the Russian economy is progressing steady towards collapse and the Russians' support for the war declines, it's all good. 49% of Russians now support retreat from Ukraine. When they do, they will have to contend with everything they wasted for nothing under the incompetent leadership of Putin.
Oh... OK, so now Ukraine is losing. The last excuse to blame America is lifted, and - "well of course Ukraine is losing old chap. Negotiations what I always advised!"
Imagine how many lives could have been saved if Biden hadn’t been an absolute coward from the very beginning. Good job FINALLY approving this change. Let’s go Brandon!
Yeah good luck with Trump in the White House 😂😂🤡🤡
@timmbot6082 Just imagine there would have been no lives lost, if the peace had been carried through!!
@@boota1979 Yeah, if he had been tough before the invasion and backed it up with action the war could have been avoided.
@@Satwamassive Never would've started if we had Trump in office this whole time.
Yes but if Biden had not supplied Ukraine with weapons That tyrant Putin would have overrun all Ukraine territory straight away so a big thanks too Joe Biden for supplying them and may God bless him
😂 biden be like lets saw how it end in one day😂😂
800 kilometer line would absorb half the American army.
What are you talking about Europe better start drafting there young people they have enough
@@sandyvalentin3072 Why should we allow our young people to be killed, fighting a war that's actual reasons are dubious at best.
@@boota1979 What does that mean the threat is in Europe back door deal with it
@@sandyvalentin3072 Only in your very narrow mind, ease off on the propaganda and go away and learn some real facts.
But UK and US have signed the Budapest agreement and are supposed to guarantee Ukrainian borders why is there a diskussion among UK comentators that Russia can keep parts of Ukraine? That means that UK won't keep their promise - or what??
Like a pinprick on an Elephants back, in fact, worse because they don't work. Meanwhile, UK Pensioners freeze owing to funds going to Ukraine.
I thought Ukraine already win the war. Was a lia?
What's a lia?
Every channel using the same old video war footage
This fool is determined to find out what f*** around and find out actually means.
LOL at russian red lines 😂, their red line storage facility was destroyed in 2022
Only 2 more months left . Trump will see end of this warmongers . American people are sick of these dem warmongers .
Once tRump learns that the weapons provided/sold clears out old US stockpiles which are being replenished by new stocks whilst providing jobs inside America in primarily Red states he will think differently.
says the Russian bot.
Be afraid Russia you are going to lose this conflict because Trump hates you as well.
Trump insiders already indicating that Trump now has Putin over a barrel and he is going to humiliate him.
The problem with long range missiles is they're easier to shoot down.
Not these ones.
This is just another gesture - like all the other highly publicised but essentially insignificant support the US has been giving. The missiles are restricted to the Kursk front and all they can possibly do is to prop up this ill-conceived Ukraine adventure a little longer.
Russia got north Korea so Ukraine got NATO.
ATACMS is not a long-range system. It's a medium-range system. Come on guys.
Incorrect
Getting a bit desperate here 😂😂 bring back the ghost of chicken Kiev
According to the Times Russia has already lost, what are they saying now. will lose more
Tell Putin to get lost
You people are always analyzing how Russia will lose at every game changer announcement. None has ever come true, yet you still continue on this path. I feel these RUclips channels are just into business with very intelligent and dubious characters
Russian botty bots get out of here!
Himars: Russia left Kherson
ATACMS: Russia left crimean harbours
❤️ seeing western pravda start prepping the losers for negotiations. Remember when they said "we want to settle this on the battlefield"? 😂😂😂pepperidge farms remembers
If Ukrainians are complaining of ammo and shell shortages then I doubt they have very many long-range missiles left.
Please...don't blemish a good story by asking questions about actual quantities.
I found 1 article that actually mentions a number. And its 50. And these guys are acting like Russia will collapse. 50 missiles.. Thats 1/5th of a real Russian missile attack.
I doubt you have any clue what you are talking about.
We need to support Ukraine as they are doing a great job in keeping Russia IN RUSSIA!!!!
Russia has been striking Ukraine with missiles for 3 yrs and yet they are still standing. A 100 plus ATACMS won't change the trajectory of the conflict. The US has very limited stock of ATACMS to use.
This also unleashes Scalp and Storm Shadow; there's talk about JASSMs. And 100 fuel and ammunition dumps and headquarters blown up is nothing to sneeze at.
@@ClemensKatzer
I agree, but I think Biden will still try and protect Putin.
@@laurencelockwood6209 Protect Putin? You must be thinking of the big narcissist baby, Gump. BTW, John Bolton related a conversation between Gump and Prime Minister Teresa May in which the subject of nuclear weapons cropped up and Gump said to her " Oh, you have nuclear weapons?" Gump didn't even know the U.K. has nukes. And this chaotic ignorant buffoon is U.S. president with all this turmoil going on. It's frightening.
They can take out key Russian hardware
@@laurencelockwood6209 Yeah, it's a headscratcher why Russia can bomb Ukraines hospitals but Ukraine can't bomb anything in Russia where it really hurts. Same cowardice with Scholz.
You people proving everyday how mad yule are.
I really believed Russia was losing and Ukraine winning, thanks to TR. Now look at them. More to the point. I dread what would happen if Russia thinks that its red line is disregarded
the uk should give up some of their territory for peace in Ukraine
Russia is loosing they loosing so much money,man power, equipment while ukraine use the money and equipment of USA and Europe