Could you please explain ATACMS to us, on a single example, i don't know something like: "Civilians on the Beach - how to be as efficient as possible with cluster amunition"?! Or something like that...I'm just asking for a Friend.
ATACMS is a ballistic missile Kh 101 is a cruise missile that has to be subsonic you are comparing the uncaparable, you should have compared ATACMS to Iskander ballistic missile.
Atacms is ballistic, Storm shadow/tornado/scalp are autonomous cruising missiles... Can't exactly compare speeds of those 2 different classes. Good animation though, I like your videos
I like how Aitelly admits he is a dumb american by not converting to km or cm any more. Last time he did it, he failed at what a 6 year old can do. I genuenly hope aiTelly chokes on the money of 10 ads per 5 minutes. Each ad 40 second thus even worse than television ads ratio.
Common Word in AITelly........ 1. Last but not the list 2. Step by Step 3. We discuss in few Later 4. Our Previous Video 5. We avoid Politics 6. Like & Subscribe
the new PrSM is now officially in service, which is a longer range missile that is fired from the same launchers. because of the medium range missile treaty that was recently scrapped, the prsm will be replacing atacms, so the US has now been delivering stockpiles of atacms to ukraine. i reckon some prsm missiles have also been used in ukraine, clandestinely, for testing
I understand that there is a replacement missile design but there is evidence the US is over extending itself and is not manufacturing a replacement quantity of artillery shells or missiles. This is concerning when our strategy to counter China is to have more precision munitions to make up for the difference in naval ships and armor units. I hope we can wake up and realize we have to take care of ourselves before helping others. Or enhance and fix our production lines to make that possible. If it were up to me we wouldn't be involved in any of it.
I'd be a bit surprised if any Prsms have been used in Ukraine. The chance that Russia could capture one or analyze debris to determine how they work and their capabilities would be too great. They're the cutting edge of missile tech and we want to keep them away from the enemy as long as possible. It's one of Germany's reasons for not sending Taurus missiles to Ukraine.
@@ImperiumLibertasWitholding aid to Ukraine and their resulting defeat would make US involvement with China more likely. We're better off helping Ukraine and ramping up our own production of weapons and ammo than we would be in hoarding what we've got.
@@cymeriandesigns how do you figure that? Russia and China aren't the best of friends. They are sometimes very limited strategic partners. Russia winning in Ukraine which will happen regardless of US supplies does not embolden China. China is in the middle of an economic collapse that they are struggling to control. The most analysis suggests China will invade between 2030-2035 which gives us between 6 and 11 years to get ready to defend our ally Taiwan. If we keep sending shipments to Ukraine we will not be ready which will result in more lost America lives.
ATACMS is a land based launched ballistic missile and you compare it's speed to two cruise missiles? Those cruise missile are more similar to USA Tomahawk missile family where the ATACMS is more similar to Russia's Kinzhal missile.
Rather, a ballistic missile of the Iskander complex. The Dagger is an air-launched rocket and accelerates faster than anyone else. Although the Iskander rocket surpasses ATOM in all characteristics and is even cheaper. This is not because I am from Russia, but because this is objective data, my friend))
@@АланМагометовичИсаев In comparison, it should be compared more with Tornado-S, it is not correct to compare these missiles with Iskander, Iskander is a heavier system - the usual equipment with high explosives is more of a compromise than the norm
This is my first visit to your channel. Having heard so much about the ATACMS system, I was intensely curious about it. Your explanation could not have been clearer. I’ll be back for more. Thanks!
8:00 Funny you use the S-400 as an example. That exacty scenario is what has been all over my news today, where the S-400 attempted and failed to interceot the ATACMS before it air bursted
The S400/Patriot is not designed to intercept ballistic missiles; there are other systems for that. Let me also remind you that in Israel, Patriot was unable to intercept 6 Iranian ballistic missiles out of 8 that it launched.
the ATACMS adopted as a surface-to-air missile modified to take out aerial drones . . . a SAM variant of ATACMS will retain the tiny bomblets of cluster munitions inside the warhead . . . a ATACMS missile is launched against incoming strike drones, moving in close formation . . . the missile detonates in close proximity to incoming drones & the exploding cluster of tiny bomblets destroy every single incoming strike drone . . . but the missile needs to intercept & destroy the incoming drones before they leave formation & head of a to engaging their individual targets . . .
This is the first video of yours that I have seen and I found it quite informative. I am Canadian and of an older generation and en engineer so I am versed in both metric and imperial unit systems and I found it curious that you stated some measurements in both silly units and metric in one part of the video and then just stuck to silly units in most of the video. That signals to me that you are Americans because you're the only country that has stuck with imperial units (although you buggered up the gallon measurement) while the rest of us have moved on to the much more sensible and easier to work with and understand metric system. I would suggest that in future you provide both imperial and metric measurements for all dimensions and specifications you provide so that everyone watching your video can fully understand them and fully comprehend the information you're providing. Most of the world doesn't understand the units that you use and that's because your units are silly and there's no logical case to be made for continuing to use them other than the fact that the majority of your population is too stubborn to learn metric. We Canadians were tasked with doing that back in the early 70s and we managed to do it albeit probably with some protest and complaints. That same task seems to have proved too difficult for America to complete and you've stuck steadfastly to your system of silly units although I find it interesting that my American made car is assembled with metric bolts. Most of us in Canada now live in a world where both systems of measurement are used and we somehow manage to understand and get along with both systems. Being Canadian and an engineer who grew up when we (Canada) were converting to metric, I'm probably more adept at converting between unit systems than anyone but I'm not fast enough to be able to convert the antiquated and irrelevant (to most of the world) specifications you provide in this video to units that are meaningful to me while I'm watching the video. So, if you're Americans and you want only Americans to be able to relate to and understand most of the things you're reporting in these videos then go on only providing specifications in your silly units that the rest of the world doesn't use and doesn't understand. If you'd like to reach a wider audience, then I'd suggest you provide the metric conversions on all the dimensions and specifications you give in your videos.
Excellent animation! Just a small correction, at 3:42, the missile KH-101 use a mall turbofan engine (the cylinder below the missile body) not a rocket engine. Storm Shadow and Tomahawk uses the same technology, but keep the motor inside, for better stealth characteristics.
INS will get the missile close to the target but the course corrections are not as exact as GPS so the impact can be off significantly as compared to GPS.
Good video. But, it seems like adding the RANGE of any self contained projectile weapon (missile, cruise missile, rocket, etc) would be a key piece of info -- especially if comparing to other weapons
Question? Is it possible that the enemy could hack the satellites? Has the missile ever been dropped on a target, without it going off? How hot is the propellant burning? How did they figure out the speed of the missile? Does the Russian Radar pick up the ATACMS MISSLE? I like how the fins are able to fold in? I betcha I could tell you where Lockheed produces these at?
Telly can you please do a video on the various drone dropped munitions used in the Ukraine conflict and various other theaters nowadays! Thanks! Love your videos!
@@gregweston3770 Actually you need to do your research. Putin started the war by invading in 2014 and 2022. He also used cyber attacks, bribery and economic cohesion against Ukraine since 2004. He has always been messing with Ukraine because he is delusional
I jus t Researched and saw The IAI Harop is a loitering munition developed by the MBT division of Israel Aerospace Industries. Loitering munitions are designed to loiter above the
Given its explosive mass, even if it didn’t destroy the bridge, it would damage the road/rails and the structures underneath them to the point where large sections would have to be replaced and the integrity of nearby structures like support pillars would have to be examined
Any explanation why exposed rockets self exploding or mostly starting its solid rocket motor when an explosion happened near them? Shock wave, emp Or just shrapnel?!
@@Aitelly i saw many videos when targeting positions: an explosion cause of aerial bomb or a rocket then the rockets where are far about 20~30 meters from the explosion starts flying every where even they are on the ground not in launcher!
I believe you are talking about munitions that get hit with fragmentation strikes or tungsten balls from artillery or strike missile. Known as secondary explosions. My guess is the strike sets off the rocket propellant or munitions somehow.
@onevablo1692Well you’re comparing a single fired 9,000 lb missile to a multiple launch 3,500 lb missile. The ATACMS has been seen destroying an entire s400 battery so I’d say it’s pretty good at anti air defense.
what type of missile is Russia using to down these missiles today in Crimea? Can you make a video that could show how they are intercepting them? Your videos are very good . thank you
@@KenC56mm 4 days ago, Russian air defense shot down two missiles (one of them with a cluster warhead) and it fell into a residential building where there were no military personnel, and the submunitions that were not activated scattered in different directions.
Could you please explain ATACMS to us, on a single example, i don't know something like: "Civilians on the Beach - how to be as efficient as possible with cluster amunition"?! Or something like that...I'm just asking for a Friend.
3:30 Storm Shadow is a cruise missile and ATACMS is a ballistic missile. It makes no sense to compare them. There is nothing exceptional about a ballistic missile going Mach 3.
They’re just compared because they’re both notable weapons striking deep behind lines in ukraine so it’s relevant to compare them to see what the differences are.
This just one single little thing of what USA can do. They have money and run many different weapons programs just be safe. Mostly their weapons are expensive and production rate is low. I mean, this is just a long range artillery system. Traditionally artillery is supposed to be cheap. To compensate they have to hit the target 100%. So you and I can think back and forth about this and where Excalibur is in this range / accuracy / price range. West have stuff that Russia do not. But it cost money and we do not have endless supply. At least we got something the Russians do not. But I refuse to call it artillery cause artillery supposed to be cheap.
brother dont compare atacms with storm shadow they are not even in the same kind of missile cruise missiles like storm shadow dont go past mach 1 atacms is a tactical ballistic missile so you should compare it to another ballistic missile the kh1101 is also a cruise missile why didnt you pick another ballistic im so confused like of course its faster thats the nature of the kind of missile it is...
What if Russia sees this and works out how to make them / countermeasure. Is this why GPS jamming signals are interfering with European commercial airline travel as reported in recent news?
In my opinion comparison between solid fuel rocket and jet propelled missiles is senseless. ATACAM have way smaller range but way higher speed. Those are different types of weapon designed to different tasks and conditions.
wowwy. they should have allowed Ukraine to do what they please. I mean rusha is going down quickly now, imagine if they did not have one hand tied behind their backs? this war would have been over a year ago.
![FORTNITE CLASSICS IS BACK! Fortnite Item Shop [November 15th, 2024] (Fortnite Chapter 5)](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/RbQURbeFwqs/mqdefault.jpg)
Please Subscribe 🙏🏻
New Bradley Fighting Vehicle :ruclips.net/video/gNHnC81K7EA/видео.htmlsi=9g-U3tILj4HDBk_d
Captain Iskander dominates, your stuff is jet target
Could you please explain ATACMS to us, on a single example, i don't know something like: "Civilians on the Beach - how to be as efficient as possible with cluster amunition"?! Or something like that...I'm just asking for a Friend.
ATACMS is a ballistic missile Kh 101 is a cruise missile that has to be subsonic you are comparing the uncaparable, you should have compared ATACMS to Iskander ballistic missile.
Atacms is ballistic, Storm shadow/tornado/scalp are autonomous cruising missiles... Can't exactly compare speeds of those 2 different classes. Good animation though, I like your videos
Yep, apples and oranges.
@bits2646 Astute observation and comment. 👍
Yess, he is probably drunk
That was about the cleanest and fastest explanation of newtons third law (thrust) I have ever heard. Simple yet dead ringer. Great video
I like how Aitelly admits he is a dumb american by not converting to km or cm any more.
Last time he did it, he failed at what a 6 year old can do.
I genuenly hope aiTelly chokes on the money of 10 ads per 5 minutes. Each ad 40 second thus even worse than television ads ratio.
Common Word in AITelly........
1. Last but not the list
2. Step by Step
3. We discuss in few Later
4. Our Previous Video
5. We avoid Politics
6. Like & Subscribe
the new PrSM is now officially in service, which is a longer range missile that is fired from the same launchers. because of the medium range missile treaty that was recently scrapped, the prsm will be replacing atacms, so the US has now been delivering stockpiles of atacms to ukraine. i reckon some prsm missiles have also been used in ukraine, clandestinely, for testing
I understand that there is a replacement missile design but there is evidence the US is over extending itself and is not manufacturing a replacement quantity of artillery shells or missiles. This is concerning when our strategy to counter China is to have more precision munitions to make up for the difference in naval ships and armor units.
I hope we can wake up and realize we have to take care of ourselves before helping others. Or enhance and fix our production lines to make that possible.
If it were up to me we wouldn't be involved in any of it.
I'd be a bit surprised if any Prsms have been used in Ukraine. The chance that Russia could capture one or analyze debris to determine how they work and their capabilities would be too great. They're the cutting edge of missile tech and we want to keep them away from the enemy as long as possible. It's one of Germany's reasons for not sending Taurus missiles to Ukraine.
@@ImperiumLibertasWitholding aid to Ukraine and their resulting defeat would make US involvement with China more likely. We're better off helping Ukraine and ramping up our own production of weapons and ammo than we would be in hoarding what we've got.
@@cymeriandesigns how do you figure that? Russia and China aren't the best of friends. They are sometimes very limited strategic partners. Russia winning in Ukraine which will happen regardless of US supplies does not embolden China.
China is in the middle of an economic collapse that they are struggling to control. The most analysis suggests China will invade between 2030-2035 which gives us between 6 and 11 years to get ready to defend our ally Taiwan. If we keep sending shipments to Ukraine we will not be ready which will result in more lost America lives.
Only a tiny amount of ATACMs successfully reached their targets. Most get jammed or intercepted
The INS (inertial nav system) is an amazing piece of 1940/50's technology.
I believe it came from Britain as it was used in the scrapped TSR 2 project
you publish videos as always in time! Thank you for explaining! I already watching it rn!
Hope you enjoyed it!
24 April : US army secretly
deliverying ATACMS to ukraine
26 April : AiTelly: step by step
Yes :)
@@Aitelly Awesome, very cool
ATACMS is a land based launched ballistic missile and you compare it's speed to two cruise missiles? Those cruise missile are more similar to USA Tomahawk missile family where the ATACMS is more similar to Russia's Kinzhal missile.
Rather, a ballistic missile of the Iskander complex. The Dagger is an air-launched rocket and accelerates faster than anyone else. Although the Iskander rocket surpasses ATOM in all characteristics and is even cheaper. This is not because I am from Russia, but because this is objective data, my friend))
@onevablo1692 Іскандер та Кинджал, це та сама ракета, просто різного базування
@@АланМагометовичИсаев In comparison, it should be compared more with Tornado-S, it is not correct to compare these missiles with Iskander, Iskander is a heavier system - the usual equipment with high explosives is more of a compromise than the norm
I literally just searched for this yesterday and you didn't have a video on it... NICE!
Thanks
Hope you enjoyed it!
2300 miles per hour is insane speed!! It's faster than the other 2 combined and I love that ❤
This is my first visit to your channel. Having heard so much about the ATACMS system, I was intensely curious about it. Your explanation could not have been clearer. I’ll be back for more. Thanks!
Some people has habit always complaining about your videos. You guys doing good job.keep it up 👍
8:00 Funny you use the S-400 as an example. That exacty scenario is what has been all over my news today, where the S-400 attempted and failed to interceot the ATACMS before it air bursted
The S400/Patriot is not designed to intercept ballistic missiles; there are other systems for that. Let me also remind you that in Israel, Patriot was unable to intercept 6 Iranian ballistic missiles out of 8 that it launched.
@@isadanjan4762Which incident are you referring to?
@@treycotter North Korea even has KN24, Hwasongpho-11Na, Hwasong-11Na (an external copy of ATACMS) with better characteristics than ATACMS itself 😆
As always,excellent work! 👏
Well done. Interesting, informative but not too advanced explanation, and well synchronized explanation with animated illustration.
Keep up the good work guys!! I look forward to viewing your videos!
정말 멋진 영상이예요
The ending, that’s amazing work. Definitely want more of that animation
the ATACMS adopted as a surface-to-air missile modified to take out aerial drones . . . a SAM variant of ATACMS will retain the tiny bomblets of cluster munitions inside the warhead . . . a ATACMS missile is launched against incoming strike drones, moving in close formation . . . the missile detonates in close proximity to incoming drones & the exploding cluster of tiny bomblets destroy every single incoming strike drone . . . but the missile needs to intercept & destroy the incoming drones before they leave formation & head of a to engaging their individual targets . . .
The area of proximity?1km square kilometres or more?
Great Video but it will be even better if it includes how ATACMS differs from others in reacting to counter measures.
Excellent brief. Thank you. Very well done.
Glad you enjoyed it!
Incredible technology 👍
This is the first video of yours that I have seen and I found it quite informative. I am Canadian and of an older generation and en engineer so I am versed in both metric and imperial unit systems and I found it curious that you stated some measurements in both silly units and metric in one part of the video and then just stuck to silly units in most of the video. That signals to me that you are Americans because you're the only country that has stuck with imperial units (although you buggered up the gallon measurement) while the rest of us have moved on to the much more sensible and easier to work with and understand metric system. I would suggest that in future you provide both imperial and metric measurements for all dimensions and specifications you provide so that everyone watching your video can fully understand them and fully comprehend the information you're providing. Most of the world doesn't understand the units that you use and that's because your units are silly and there's no logical case to be made for continuing to use them other than the fact that the majority of your population is too stubborn to learn metric. We Canadians were tasked with doing that back in the early 70s and we managed to do it albeit probably with some protest and complaints. That same task seems to have proved too difficult for America to complete and you've stuck steadfastly to your system of silly units although I find it interesting that my American made car is assembled with metric bolts. Most of us in Canada now live in a world where both systems of measurement are used and we somehow manage to understand and get along with both systems.
Being Canadian and an engineer who grew up when we (Canada) were converting to metric, I'm probably more adept at converting between unit systems than anyone but I'm not fast enough to be able to convert the antiquated and irrelevant (to most of the world) specifications you provide in this video to units that are meaningful to me while I'm watching the video. So, if you're Americans and you want only Americans to be able to relate to and understand most of the things you're reporting in these videos then go on only providing specifications in your silly units that the rest of the world doesn't use and doesn't understand. If you'd like to reach a wider audience, then I'd suggest you provide the metric conversions on all the dimensions and specifications you give in your videos.
I waited for this video! Great channel 👍
Damn the military industrial complex.
Excellent animation!
Just a small correction, at 3:42, the missile KH-101 use a mall turbofan engine (the cylinder below the missile body) not a rocket engine. Storm Shadow and Tomahawk uses the same technology, but keep the motor inside, for better stealth characteristics.
Great video just wish it was in modern measurements
Thanks for the Feedback.
Your. Videos are just amazing and it is because the way you explain and the animation
Excellent video 📹!!! Your content rocks 🪨 🎸!!
Thanks so much!!
INS will get the missile close to the target but the course corrections are not as exact as GPS so the impact can be off significantly as compared to GPS.
Good video. But, it seems like adding the RANGE of any self contained projectile weapon (missile, cruise missile, rocket, etc) would be a key piece of info -- especially if comparing to other weapons
Question?
Is it possible that the enemy could hack the satellites?
Has the missile ever been dropped on a target, without it going off?
How hot is the propellant burning?
How did they figure out the speed of the missile?
Does the Russian Radar pick up the ATACMS MISSLE?
I like how the fins are able to fold in?
I betcha I could tell you where Lockheed produces these at?
ATACMS speed should be compared to Iskander not KH 101 or Scalp / Storm Shadow ! you compare oringes to aplles ...
can you explain the TOS-1A munitons
Объемно детонирующий.
I'd love to see a video about K2,, Black Panther"👀
I'm impressed with your work.. Keep doing it..
I very much enjoyed your video and I gave it a Thumbs Up
At this point I think RUclips is reading my mind i was just thinking 🤔 about howr Atacm and himars only just to scroll and see this video 🎉❤
Telly can you please do a video on the various drone dropped munitions used in the Ukraine conflict and various other theaters nowadays! Thanks! Love your videos!
Thanks Will research on the said Subject
Nice piece sir , how do you measure ( location ) your target , and how to find it ................ ?!
This is why pootin is desperate to jam GPS lol
Putin made GPS and america made glonass? Lol 😂😂
Do your research
NATO started the Ukraine war
@@gregweston3770 Actually you need to do your research. Putin started the war by invading in 2014 and 2022. He also used cyber attacks, bribery and economic cohesion against Ukraine since 2004. He has always been messing with Ukraine because he is delusional
@@gregweston3770Do your research. This war is only Russia’s fault.
@@FacitOmniaVoluntas.nah, ukraine broke multiple contracts resulting in a war
Ur videos are amazing, what software do u use to prepare this animation
Blender for 3d
Adobe After Effects for Compositing
and Adobe Primer for Editing
Could you make one for the HAROP? Or LORA Tactical Missile?
I jus t Researched and saw The IAI Harop is a loitering munition developed by the MBT division of Israel Aerospace Industries. Loitering munitions are designed to loiter above the
Excellent video 😊!
Can it kill a bridge?
Yes
I guess we'll soon find out.
Yes with harpoon warhead
Given its explosive mass, even if it didn’t destroy the bridge, it would damage the road/rails and the structures underneath them to the point where large sections would have to be replaced and the integrity of nearby structures like support pillars would have to be examined
Какой? Киевский? Он может разрушить все 12 мостов в Киеве. И верховную раду. Искандером.
Any explanation why exposed rockets self exploding or mostly starting its solid rocket motor when an explosion happened near them? Shock wave, emp Or just shrapnel?!
Can you rephrase your Question
@@Aitelly i saw many videos when targeting positions: an explosion cause of aerial bomb or a rocket then the rockets where are far about 20~30 meters from the explosion starts flying every where even they are on the ground not in launcher!
I believe you are talking about munitions that get hit with fragmentation strikes or tungsten balls from artillery or strike missile. Known as secondary explosions. My guess is the strike sets off the rocket propellant or munitions somehow.
@@Joetechlincolns my question is about this "some how": shock wave or emp will trigger the munition or the solid fuel rocket?
Next video B-1 lancer
We did a small Video of the B1 Lancer
Gorgeous animation it is
very good missile, now we can confirm this)
@onevablo1692Well you’re comparing a single fired 9,000 lb missile to a multiple launch 3,500 lb missile. The ATACMS has been seen destroying an entire s400 battery so I’d say it’s pretty good at anti air defense.
North Korea even has KN24, Hwasongpho-11Na, Hwasong-11Na (an external copy of ATACMS) with better characteristics than ATACMS itself 😆
V2 perfected
The cluster version is the ticket 👍
dont know what bangs harder, the munition or the video!
Would you consider working on a video covering dense inert metal explosive? Thank you for the content
Great work guy's
what type of missile is Russia using to down these missiles today in Crimea? Can you make a video that could show how they are intercepting them? Your videos are very good .
thank you
They are intercepting these with infantry, buildings, and grounded planes.
Simple. They aren't intercepting
@@KenC56mm 4 days ago, Russian air defense shot down two missiles (one of them with a cluster warhead) and it fell into a residential building where there were no military personnel, and the submunitions that were not activated scattered in different directions.
@@KenC56mm North Korea even has KN24, Hwasongpho-11Na, Hwasong-11Na (an external copy of ATACMS) with better characteristics than ATACMS itself 😆
@@vanhelsing5469 🤣
Do a video on
boeing P 8 Poseidon
i doubt it will get views. RUclips Algorithm is sadly defined by SEOS (search engine Optimizations)
Is ATACMS the successor to the hawk missile?
Good information
Can you make video on Shaheen 3 capability?
Pakistan missile program is Dangerous more than Iran or India?
Beautiful
Well done.
3:45 you're comparing cruise missiles to ballistic missiles. Not comparable.
But still good video!
comparing cruise missiles to this is rather annoying
You’re not gonna cry, are you?
@@Thwarptide yes I just might
🔥
Is there a pulley to lift the rocket into the Reload Arm Assembly so a single person can reload the system?
Houthi Cleric furiously tapping a chisel trying to inscribe on a stone tablet as much of this videos information, as his assistant can translate .....
Please do a video on the themis unmanned ground vehicle...
Sweet
25TH AMENDMENT, NOW!!!
Now we’re all on the FBI watch list
can you also tell us how radar works in never did physics in high school
Could you please explain ATACMS to us, on a single example, i don't know something like: "Civilians on the Beach - how to be as efficient as possible with cluster amunition"?! Or something like that...I'm just asking for a Friend.
Lol, russia admitted they shot down the ATACMS over the beach causing debris to fall on the beach on the day it happened.
Amazing video brother, Ukraine has been using these effectively
Bro use SI units for better understanding 😊😊
Can you explain how the aegis system works?
3:33 You can't in good faith compare a tactical ballistic missile to a cruise missile.
Apologies we just got carried away :(
@@Aitelly It's all good just something to keep in mind for future videos.
👍👍
liked your video
3:30 Storm Shadow is a cruise missile and ATACMS is a ballistic missile. It makes no sense to compare them. There is nothing exceptional about a ballistic missile going Mach 3.
They’re just compared because they’re both notable weapons striking deep behind lines in ukraine so it’s relevant to compare them to see what the differences are.
Very informative commentary…thanks
Thanks
Let's make some video about 155mm erfb, rocket assistant and vulcano shell
Iskander next please
👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
This just one single little thing of what USA can do. They have money and run many different weapons programs just be safe. Mostly their weapons are expensive and production rate is low. I mean, this is just a long range artillery system. Traditionally artillery is supposed to be cheap. To compensate they have to hit the target 100%. So you and I can think back and forth about this and where Excalibur is in this range / accuracy / price range. West have stuff that Russia do not. But it cost money and we do not have endless supply. At least we got something the Russians do not. But I refuse to call it artillery cause artillery supposed to be cheap.
brother dont compare atacms with storm shadow they are not even in the same kind of missile cruise missiles like storm shadow dont go past mach 1 atacms is a tactical ballistic missile so you should compare it to another ballistic missile the kh1101 is also a cruise missile why didnt you pick another ballistic im so confused like of course its faster thats the nature of the kind of missile it is...
I came to make the same comment
Preformed Fragments = Cluster Bomb
❤❤❤
Please make video on latest EMBT tank ❤
👍😎🍺🍩🚀🚀..
3:23 Why the speed was not indicated in kilometers and meters per second!
Becouse the US don't roll that way... We use freedom units thank you very much.
? .. how does THIS ATACMS video differ from one 8 months ago?
*Behind the scenes of the missile:*
Turn left, Turn right in 100 m, Point Up,
You have arrived at your destination. BOOM.
What if Russia sees this and works out how to make them / countermeasure. Is this why GPS jamming signals are interfering with European commercial airline travel as reported in recent news?
In my opinion comparison between solid fuel rocket and jet propelled missiles is senseless. ATACAM have way smaller range but way higher speed. Those are different types of weapon designed to different tasks and conditions.
USING OF MAGNETIC LASER CAN CHANGE THE DIRECTION OF MISSILE AND CAN STOP THE EXPLOTION
what you say makes no sense
@@lucasgarcia7230 BUILT A MAGNETIC LASER AND 1 BILLION % THE PROOF IS WORKING LOOK AT THE LASER USING OF UFO,, THAT IS A MAGNETIC LIGHT
@@lucasgarcia7230 5 BILLION DOLLAR IM WRITE HOW TO MAKE A MAGNETIC LASER
@@lucasgarcia7230 CERN CAN CONVERT INTO MAGNETIC LASER,, 3 BILLION DOLLAR IM WRITE HOW TO CONVERT THE CERN INTO MAGNETIC LASER
WRITE AND SHOW IF YOU HAVE AN INTILLIGENT BOASTFUL,, SHAME !@@lucasgarcia7230
Can you use a couple of Fat Man Nukes as it's payload instead? -Vault Dweller 🤔
America with the win…again. 🇺🇸🤙🏼
Are you planning to do F-22 Raptor?
wowwy. they should have allowed Ukraine to do what they please. I mean rusha is going down quickly now, imagine if they did not have one hand tied behind their backs? this war would have been over a year ago.