Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 November 19
November 19
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:31, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:PA190096.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- 2 Dimensional artwork/ Charcter Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:31, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:31, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The image was previously published and credited to Justin Bishop: http://www.austinchronicle.com/gyrobase/Issue/story?oid=oid%3A803118 , contradicting the uploader's description. Mosmof (talk) 03:06, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:31, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:KeralaHighwayPolice.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- It is unclear from the source what the license is. Sreejith K (talk) 11:49, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:31, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Emc1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- See commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Emc1.jpg for my concerns, unlikely own work. Martin H. (talk) 14:28, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:31, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Regine mtv asia.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- widely distributed press photo, made its way even on the website of the depicted person http://reginemultimedia.com/photogallery/index.php?currDir=./Events/MTV_Asia_Awards/2002 - not the uplaoders own work. Martin H. (talk) 15:17, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- See also the first upload (cant see it but same description: Regine Velasquez During The MTV asia Awards) - the claim of "own work" is completely false. A shame that the uploader even repeated that false claim. --Martin H. (talk) 15:23, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:31, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Given the other copyvio uploads by the uploader (see one above) and given the possible age of the uplaoder (see user page: undergraduate student) this is unliekly own work. Grabbed from some website or screenshot, false claim of 'entirely own work'. Not what we want to have on Wikipedia. --Martin H. (talk) 15:34, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:31, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I've found a higher resolution image here and that dates earlier to the upload date here. The photo here has a very different event description to the external site. —SpacemanSpiff 16:51, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: procedural keep. This venue is for freely licensed files with disputed source or licensing information. FFD is that way. — ξxplicit 00:34, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Rory Delap Throw-In.ogg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- I don't know how this file helps the reader understand the subject better. The audio recording doesn't explain what is happening in the throw, just that a throw is about occur (followed by the throw occuring and a goal). —Half Price 17:01, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:31, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Russell-hantz.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Image looks like it's a promotional image used for the TV show, and does not appear to be free. Strange Passerby (talk • contribs) 17:15, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:32, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Claimed as PD-author, though the author is unknown. Date is 1943. Acather96 (talk) 18:15, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The file is the digital photograph of a painting of Havildar Parkash Singh, VC, which is on display at the Baloch Regimental Centre Museum, Abbottabad, Pakistan. As the Regimental Historian and Archivist, I have full authority to release it in public domain. Beloochee (talk)
- Really need evidence into WP:OTRS that the original painter gave up rights to the Museum, and subsequently that the Museum has then released it into the public domain. MilborneOne (talk) 20:44, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.