+TAOFLEDERMAUS NANANANANA it's fine. It's just a Soyuz type landing. It landed in brush and made it look way worse than it is. I near they got "special chairs" for that deceleration, so all is good! If I didn't want to be weightless for more than 4 minutes, I would be crowdfunding right now!
+B Kalley Why fix what isn't broken? It has been proven to work so why not use it? There is no point updating it if it works... Tho they might use newer components, machinery and manufacturing but the base functionality and logic would be the same.
+Henri Hänninen "There is no point updating it if it works.." -- that kind of attitude would have us still using horses for transportation. It's been 43 years since we've been to the Moon. We haven't even gone to another planet yet, nevermind to another star or galaxy. If we want humans to become a space-fairing race we have a hell of a lot of work to do.
nah. its a different market. blue origin is only for hopping straight up to 100km and spacex is actually going to orbit. wich for some things (like tourism) isnt really needed
@@jannik6147 They're working on the New Glenn rocket which will rival the Falcon Heavy. Will be cool to see how Blue Origin's new rocket will perform and land once ready in 2021.
To all the people complaining about the landing of the capsule. If I remember correctly, the capsules had little rockets at the bottom that launch just before hitting the ground. The dust you see is from those rockets not from impact.
+Blue Sky HD dude what do you mean "if i remember"? o.O......go back and slow down the video and check it out yourself before just stating something you might be wrong at and then go try to tell people how they are wrong.
+joshua hughes (Naktura) man tbh idc, my comment had nothing to do with the capsule. it had to do with the dude who wrote something possibly wrong without facts and then try to tell other people how they are wrong
Jim Marshall *Some people didn't notice, but it landed Dead Center on the Landing Pad, that's pretty impressive. I can see them scaling it up, you have to start out small to prove your theory, and once you do then you can build it on an ever larger scale.* *Getting that Rocket to Relight and Throttle up and Down and 'Gimbal' while it's Falling Rapidly to Earth, the way it did took some complex engineering, considering you have to balance the Center of Gravity on a Rocket Flame.*
Jim Marshall *Those control surfaces as well were programmed to guide the rocket back to the pad while unpowered and put it in the correct attitude and position for a Powered Rocket Descent to a precise landing.* *Altogether, Quite a programming feat.*
+Albert Esteva don't give nk the credit of even thinking of attempting this XD their military still uses wwII planes, and pretty sure anything super advanced is bought/ stolen from another country.
+Shaza Maza The part in space is obviously fake, the rocket takeoff and landing seem real enough for me, and i'm a 3D graphics designer/game designer so i really know how far computer graphics have come.
@@meezalamazala279 Actually Blue origins was the first, they did it on 23rd November 2015 and spaceX landed their rocket one month after on 21st of December 2015... But the difference from the New Shepard and Falcon 9 is that the Falcon 9 is much bigger and heavier than the New Shepard and unlike the falcon 9, the New Shepard stays mostly vertical, making it less of a challenge to land it.
@@astrotw3680 " The Falcon 1 was the first rocket manufactured by SpaceX. It had a proposed capacity to carry 670 kilograms (1,480 lbs.) to low Earth orbit, and it flew between 2006 and 2009. " Forget sub-orbital, SpaceX went to orbit before Jeff went to space
This is suborbital. Now they are working on orbital vehicles, but they are currently making massive strides in an area a lot easier and different from SpaceX. They can be less efficient and less (percentage) accurate.
+Arraysion Hopefully so. I'm a big Space X fan, but they need the competition. But as one person mentioned- that is really apples and oranges as far as the landings. Space X is attempting orbital launches with 300+ mile away landings, on a very volatile ocean platform. Exciting times, either way.
+Benjamin Sturm i severely doubt it is for sale jeff bezos is work more than musk and he rather likes his venture now that he is selling rocket motors to ULA
@@endergamesbr1322 well blue origin made a huge achievement, why can't we just celebrate that, why do we have to say "haha SpaceX good blue origin bad"
spacex is the clear winner.. this has been designed to land rather than for the dual purpose of taking payload into orbit and land like falcon.. only thing you can compare this is with the spacex grasshopper
***** At a much higher cost, and they don't plan to sell to customers. Whereas Blue Origin's business model is to take people on suborbital space tourist visits - SpaceX doesn't plan to do that ever.
+Ambient Morality Of course it's going to cost much to go into orbit and reach mach 30 rather than just go mach 3 and just touch the edge of the atmosphere. Btw they are selling to customers and NASA is just one of them. SpaceX main focus is to put people on mars.
***** Yes, but that doesn't mean they're the winner. They're not competing in the same market as Blue Origin. It's roughly like comparing the power of an iPhone versus a gaming desktop computer - an iPhone obviously has some ability to do light gaming, but its goal really is never to compete with a gaming computer. Is the gaming computer better at gaming? Sure but it's going to cost a lot more, be less portable, etc. I'm aware of who SpaceX sells to. Blue Origin so far isn't selling anything, but I think we'll see the first flights being sold soon.
+MorninAfterKill Whats sick is people actually believe man or anything else can go into space. They cant get past the Van Allen Belt. It's a con job on you...
+David Butler That was my first thought. Who would have thought that what was essentially economizing on the price of cheap special effects by running the film in reverse to make it look like a landing for a movie would now be done in real life, but with having to resort to trick film photography!
PinkOld I'd seen the SpaceX crashes and just started to think it was a technology beyond our ability, but damn, here it is. Such a small rocket too! Looking forward to seeing more tests and the first manned flight.
+David Butler Try to not underestimate how much harder an orbital landing is than a simple VTOL landing. Not to mention how much larger the Falcon 9 rockets are than the Blue Origin rockets, which also makes it much easier to land.
+Colton Wishon This isn't just a VTOL landing though. The gimbal control is successful. The Earth was busy rotating underneath the vehicle as soon as it took off. The ascent and descent angles were not nearly as steep, but it still landed in the field of view of their LZ cameras!
Great landing! Guys the only fake part is the CGI from 1:13 to 1:34 to show what it will be like for the passengers. The takeoff and landing is 100% real and this venture has been working towards this for years.
+Christopher Lilly 1.51 to 2.15 are CGI. look at the flame on the rocket and also, obviously, the dust blown up on the surface before it lands, its not even that good CGI.
+Maarten Mulders I don't expect space scientists to know how to build a house or repair a car or make a wood table or chair, etc, everyone is a specialist on their respective fields and a noob on others, perhaps those scientists were noobs at parties, you know, when you party to much you don't invent impressive tech. ;P
Incredible, I cant imagine the awesome engineering nightmare involved in keeping the thing in balance the whole time and the ultra fine precision that is needed in the thrust.
Yes, but Jeff is not in it for the species or the science. He's in it for the money. Therefore, he will never be able to achieve what space is is doing, or at least not for another decade or more.
I love how it comes down off center and makes a last second correction to translate to the center of the pad. If I try to do the same lateral flight maneuver in KSP, I'll crash. But that rocket makes it look so easy.
But it needs a flat earth to land on. Do you realize how difficult it is to stand or even walk on a ball? ruclips.net/video/Zpme3-qdyz4/видео.html ruclips.net/video/gVEVmCDRklY/видео.html
Congratulations to everyone at #BlueOrigin ! You all did an amazing job! Man I wish I could be there with you along this epic journey you've embarked on! Please hire me? :)
why because someone made a cartoon on a tv screen? holy fuck you people are sick. trillions of money in taxes and still waiting for a picture of earth.....you're happy at least. money well spent. it's no surprise.....you space fuck boys get boners over anime cartoons.....you getting a boner over this cartoon would be no different. you refuse to use your brain and just do as you're told, whatever is inside your dogmatic belief system.....but others are stupid? got it. good luck learning whatever your masters require.
My guess is that both Elon and Jeff are both far enough removed from the actual development of the rocket it doesn't matter for shit, but I'm sure they both understand what's going on. Elon is obviously smarter than Jeff, but what you said is not a good comparison.
I mean they have different goals. Elon wants mars but Bezos wants O’Neill cylinders. SpaceX is transparent about their rocket development but Blue Origin is more secretive. From what I know, Blue Origin is closer to getting New Glenn done than SpaceX with starship.
Five years later: Still haven’t been to orbit. Still haven’t launched astronauts. Still resting comfortably on their laurels. EDIT: Well, they haven't given up. They've launched astronauts now. I don't wish any bad on them, only that they would improve and reach their full potential!
+Escape for Mankind Can you elaborate on what you meant by "Prove their theory"? .. whose and what theory do you mean? And, why the Sherlock comment? Cmon.
While sub orbital flight is not the same as SpaceX returning from orbital flight, I still think Blue Origin has done an amazing job. I'm excited to see what their future holds.
+Jeffrey Root Suborbital space is about 62 miles above Earth, which is the maximum heights New Shepard can reach. The International Space Station is 4 times higher than that. Until then we cannot compare Blue Origin to SpaceX but we can compare Blue Origin to Virgin Galactic in that they are in the same competition.
+Jeffrey Root There's no such thing as "suborbital space." There's just space. There are suborbital flights *into* space, and there are orbital flights *into* space. The main difference between suborbital and orbital is how fast you're going. Orbital flights are at much higher speeds than suborbital flights.
+Guy Gantor Sorry guy Gantor. I should have said suborbital flight rather than suborbital space. I didn't mean to offend you. Point being, SpaceX is trying to do something much harder and the Falcon 9 is in a completely different competition than New Shepherd.
Here some people are making joke of "Blue Origin" but reality is that both blue origin and space X are doing great work at their place... I respect both space X and blue origin 🖤💙....
the falcon 9 landing is definitely cooler. new shepard decelerates to a very low velocity then land while the falcon 9 decelerates at a constant rate. HOVER SLAM I like how Jeff bezos said what spacex is trying to do is the same in an interview (a very rich billionaire can be so cheap) , then just recently announces to launch an orbital flight by the end of the decade. Spacex might be doing their first landings on mars by then.
Yeah sure, I hope your not stupid enough to put your money where your mouth is and invest in spacex. Go drive in your gay rich boy Tesla watch spacex crash and burn!
wow ive been a fan of elon for a long and followed him, i haven't really noticed that jeff is doing these things too, that's amazing! i've heard of blue origin but i didn't know that jeff was behind this.. That's cool, very interesting guy and with limitless resources, he could really achieve great things for all of humanity, im really excited to follow blue origin too now!
@@greentea1396 If I try to be a hardcore flat-earther, will I get a free flight "to convince me"? I AM A HARDCORE FLAT-EARTHER HEAR ME I WANT A FREE FLIGHT!!
@@greentea1396 I have the Mars virus. Insatiable hunger to breathe the clear unpolluted airs of Mars. Run thru the dunes. Feel the wind and the freedom... Maybe a little outdoor campfire, frying Marsmallows, with the earth above... how wonderful! I go for it!
Это было круто!!! Уникальная точность и синхронность! Даже не представляю через что прошлось пройти инженерам, чтобы отработать момент касания с землей! Мое уважение разработчикам, инженерам, рабочим, и конечно Джеффу!!
Where are the burnt marks on the floor after the rocket landed? Only see bottom of the "rocket" slightly charred, but what about the floor where all that rocket fuel blasted against?
+St S Surprisingly, concrete holds up very well to the exhaust of a rocket. It's probably the high-temp resistant concrete they've used for the VTOL jump-jets like the Harrier and the F-35, which can easily push off exhaust and take the high-temp environment easily.
+St S Ever seen Kennedy Space Center's Pad 39, where the used to launch the shuttle? Giant concrete bunker, still around, still launching rockets off it. (Soon.) The shuttle had a shitload more thrust. The pad for the rocket will be fine.
I must say...I'm pretty fucking impressed!! Looks like a dream, still can't believe what I just saw. That precise landing, those thrusters keeping it vertical. Incredible just incredible!
Sten Ritterfeld Grasshopper wasn't suborbital, that's my point. It went to a few hundred meters, then back. It never had the ability to go to even near space, and especially not to guide itself back to a safe landing if it managed to get into space.
Mid Night Cool, but it didn't. It (F9R-Dev1, the successor to Grasshopper that flew a few times) did actually attempt a flight up to 3000m with 3 engines instead of one, but it exploded on ascent and they didn't worry about replacing it.
+Sim Shalom Just because the booster rocket have to fix 11 degree of freedom, i.e., position (x,y,z), velocity (u,v,w), attitude(pitch,roll), angler rate (pitch rate, roll rate, yaw rate).
Why, I just saw the first reusable rocket landing right here, nothing fell over or blew up so why would I want to waste my time with SpaceX shitshow -go troll elsewhere!
Every parent is proud when they see their child can drive a car to the end of the driveway and then drive all the way back in reverse. But it's a completely different story when they drive an 18-wheeler down the driveway then around the block. Then they put it in reverse and drive it all the way back and back into the same driveway.
Wow! Nice Definitely not a trivial accomplishment, no matter the size. But I do think the SpaceX approach is better, so far. He’s delivered a lot of cargo and now astronauts to the ISS and put a lot of satellites in orbit.
I love that there are companies finally advancing the space indurstry, but let's not get over excited about things: They reached space, not orbit. So currently this is at most a rocket powered elevator, or a wicked theme park ride. In order for this to be groundbreaking, they'd pretty much have to reach orbit, then land. Edit: People, seriously, I get that the thing landed. Reusable! Woot! :D I get that it's the first single stage rocket that went up to space and back and did a propulsive landing. I merely pointed out that getting to space is not so interesting if you can't keep on being in space (AKA achieve orbit), even if your rocket is reusable. When BO or SX find a way to make the entire thing "rapidly reusable", that's where the groundbreaking will happen.
Igen, de alapvetően csak a SpaceX rekordját tolták meg felfelé, amit ők már pár éve felállítottak a Falcon 1 és 9-cel. Szal értem én. Ügyesek. Magasabb. "Ez már az űr." De kb semmit se jelent mert ez a rakéta nem jó kb semmire mert nem képes felvinni dolgokat földkörüli pályára, hanem függőlegesen felszáll magas(abb)ra és leszáll. Pályára állítani valamit kicsit nehezebb mert ahhoz kell még a talonba durván 7 km/sec-nyi deltaV, amihez nagyobb rakéta is kell, meg több stage. Nem az a nehéz hogy eljuss az űrig meg vissza, hanem hogy pályára is állíts valamit és utána szállj le minden alkatrésszel. Majd ha az sikerül, az lesz groundbreaking.
+András Kühn - not exactly true - this is only first stage of rocket. For now, for every flight you have to build new one, which is over 50% of costs for space flight. But if You can use first stage multiple times - whola, You got flight to orbit for only 50% of today costs.
+Wojtek Sykurski It's not an "only first stage" - New Shepard is a single stage suborbital rocket meant for manned flight. (There will be a derivative rocket designed for orbital flights, but it's a different project and not a priority). They've been iterating vehicles not because of their inability to reuse them, cause they do have it, but because they are progressing in a development, and AFAIK they did not build a new one for every flight, no idea where you got that information from. Also, FYI: SpaceX wants to reuse only the first stage. Second stage is expandable, like in any other multistage rocket out there. Your assessment that it's decreasing the price by only 50% is obviously false.
+SkywalkerWroc - You are talking only about this configuration ;) According to some speculations and news on forum.nasaspaceflight.com/ i think that BO may also want to go for LEO flights (same as SpaceX). But definitely, they have different strategy than SpaceX - first build something smaller but working, than go further.
It really is an achievement to be the third company to successfully drone launch and land such a rocket. The Delta clipper being first, SpaceX second and Blue Origin now third. Who will be the first to bring paying customers to space?.. I mean passengers, SpaceX's deliveries to the space station aren't passengers. Well there the russians.. I guess their first. The point is, whoever brings safe affordable access to space will benefit themselves as well as the world.
it's gonna be great, this will bring a big competition, the best kind of competition, one thing i wonder is 8 years from now i wanna know how many rocket launches in a month?
FLAT STONE Just amazed by what unsuspecting suckers so many people seem to be. I was just letting you know that this video is obviously fake. I guess that was not the most polite way of saying it... but I was just kind of bewildered by the comments here.
The Glans capsule, after vigorously penetrating space, safely deployed it's prophylactic chute. The mighty Shaft, having fueled the climax of this event, thrust it's way back to a fully erect landing. Faces were squirted with champagne. Then everyone smoked a cigarette & took a nap.
Yes it's real! But it is not a very big rocket. Only 1/4 size of Falcon 9 or Atlas V Rockets. Fly's to about 100 km altitude and not at earth orbital speeds.
Clay Norrbin That part was made to look especially fake, so the rest SEEMS more real. BUT it's ALL FAKE. No burn marks from the landing? Yeah... it's FAKE
Dreamer 111 www.theverge.com/2015/11/24/9790510/blue-origin-reusable-rockets-vertical-landing-spacex even Elon Musk said it was real, and they are sort of rival company's. Of course, he brings up how much bigger his rockets are. Still, Blue Origins has the first successful reussable first stage.
this would be so much better MINUS the animation.....the general public will dismiss the real history made because of the animated sequence.......please re-edit!
+TheSilverEnthusiast *My City, Palmdale CA, just received a $60 billion Defense Contract 2 weeks ago for the next generation Bomber, built by Northrup Grumman, about 3 miles from me at Air Force Plant 42*
Great work, congratulations. Wouldn't it be more economical and safer to design both the rocket and capsule to return as airplanes landing on runways? And the launching too?
Mad props for doing this for real, that's some real rocket science there.
+Scott Manley Where did they get this 4-person cupola module though? is that some mod?
+Scott Manley Why are those guys not working with SpaceX?
+tutracrafty Because they're in competition with them. Amazon's Jeff Bezos owns Blue Origin like Musk owns SpaceX.
+tutracrafty they probably have their own dreams
+tutracrafty SpaceX is the first choise this was the second?
The capsule landing looks like it would have broken some spines. Where do I sign up?
+TAOFLEDERMAUS I don't understand why we can't just shoot them out of a shotgun.
I think the rocket would work better if it was shot from hi-brass with a laser.
+TAOFLEDERMAUS NANANANANA it's fine. It's just a Soyuz type landing. It landed in brush and made it look way worse than it is. I near they got "special chairs" for that deceleration, so all is good! If I didn't want to be weightless for more than 4 minutes, I would be crowdfunding right now!
+TAOFLEDERMAUS I know right? It just looked like a brid took a dump from orbit.
+TAOFLEDERMAUS seemed softer than Soyuz. Granted, that's not saying much, but it looked survivable.
2:47 the girl in the back, someone help her take the cork out of the bottle.
lol
🤣🤣🤣
😂 😂
that is so sad 😔
Lol
The graphics are great. What mod are you using in ksp?
XD love it.
+Potato Douche RSS + Scatterer ULTRA
Real Plume, Hullcam VDS, Real Chutes
Love the new version of MechJeb, landing assist has never been more accurate.
Realism overhaul, mechjeb v3, Infinite fuel, FAR and XXL realistic Testure Patch
SpaceX: That's cute.
Blue origin even trying is comedy gold
It's very kerbal looking when it lands xD
we shall see in the next couple years. i think they just have different missions and blue origin will bring real competition to space x with new glenn
@jan furio Rockets should not be judged on how they look.
Jeff who?
Who, is the guy, who didn't choose metric, for aerospace.
Ugh ikr
edit : this is future me and i still hate imperial
Who tf doesn't choose metric for aerospace?? So you're gonna be saying like we're 10 miles above the surface?? Wtf is this?
Jeff bezos
Not an idiot
@@zachprouty8595 I disagree.
I don't think most people will understand how hard this is to do!
+ImAnderZEL .... psh. i know how hard it is.. ive played kerbal space program!. im practically a rocket scientist :D
+ImAnderZEL It's not that hard if you use Mechjeb...
A day without advertising KSP is a day lost, isn't it?
+B Kalley Why fix what isn't broken? It has been proven to work so why not use it? There is no point updating it if it works... Tho they might use newer components, machinery and manufacturing but the base functionality and logic would be the same.
+Henri Hänninen "There is no point updating it if it works.." -- that kind of attitude would have us still using horses for transportation. It's been 43 years since we've been to the Moon. We haven't even gone to another planet yet, nevermind to another star or galaxy. If we want humans to become a space-fairing race we have a hell of a lot of work to do.
Me: Mom! i want space x!
Mom: Already have space x at home
Space X at home:
nah. its a different market. blue origin is only for hopping straight up to 100km and spacex is actually going to orbit. wich for some things (like tourism) isnt really needed
*at home.
Hmm?? R u sure that's a rocket miniature and not some naughty toys?
@@jannik6147 I would pay more if I can stay in space for days instead of seconds.
@@jannik6147 They're working on the New Glenn rocket which will rival the Falcon Heavy. Will be cool to see how Blue Origin's new rocket will perform and land once ready in 2021.
To all the people complaining about the landing of the capsule. If I remember correctly, the capsules had little rockets at the bottom that launch just before hitting the ground. The dust you see is from those rockets not from impact.
+Blue Sky HD The crazies are running amok, they see what they choose to see...poor chemically unbalanced nitwits.
+Blue Sky HD it's from the impact you douchebag!
+Blue Sky HD Let's call those little rockets the Spinal Tap
+Blue Sky HD dude what do you mean "if i remember"? o.O......go back and slow down the video and check it out yourself before just stating something you might be wrong at and then go try to tell people how they are wrong.
+joshua hughes (Naktura) man tbh idc, my comment had nothing to do with the capsule. it had to do with the dude who wrote something possibly wrong without facts and then try to tell other people how they are wrong
Watching that engine gimbal all over the place to keep her vertical was mad precision!
+Jim Marshall
*Not just to keep it Vertical, it was Guiding the Rocket to land on a specific spot.*
+Escape for Mankind
Which made it even more complex in execution.
Jim Marshall
*Some people didn't notice, but it landed Dead Center on the Landing Pad, that's pretty impressive. I can see them scaling it up, you have to start out small to prove your theory, and once you do then you can build it on an ever larger scale.*
*Getting that Rocket to Relight and Throttle up and Down and 'Gimbal' while it's Falling Rapidly to Earth, the way it did took some complex engineering, considering you have to balance the Center of Gravity on a Rocket Flame.*
+Escape for Mankind
And props to the code writers for the control software.
Jim Marshall
*Those control surfaces as well were programmed to guide the rocket back to the pad while unpowered and put it in the correct attitude and position for a Powered Rocket Descent to a precise landing.*
*Altogether, Quite a programming feat.*
This is the source of pride. the fact that 2 private american companies can do what most governments can't and what Kim Jun Un has failed to do.
+SPER Hmmm...a NK sycophant propagandist.
+SPER LOL nk can barley get a rocket to fly period, reusing isn't even on their radar that's just silly.
+Albert Esteva Kim Jun Un, although he wrote thousands of books by the age of 13, he still hasn't done it :_(
+Albert Esteva don't give nk the credit of even thinking of attempting this XD their military still uses wwII planes, and pretty sure anything super advanced is bought/ stolen from another country.
+Albert Esteva Private sector doing better than government should not be a surprise. Still... this feat _is_ something to be proud of.
It could use a little more thrust & stability. I recommend adding two spherical-shaped engines to the base of the rocket.
allyourmoney easier said than done. And they are making a whole new rocket so it doesn’t matter.
Nathan Lewis oh shit i just got it
Faze_ _StaLin no probs man
oh wow i didn't know you were a fucking rocket scientist. i'm sure it's that simple
@@BlahstarRecords r/woooosh
LOL @ 2:47 - The Girl with the champagne bottle :P
+omarmirzaa that awkward moment :]
Lol hard not to notice the epic pop fail
lol thank you for pointing that out
haha.... good observation
+omarmirzaa failure to launch.
Some insects got fried in the making of this video.
+ExploreList Hope it never has to land in tall, dry grass.
Or, if it misses by a mile and tries landing in the middle of a Walmart parking lot. :D
No loss
PETA is on our back now. Fuck.
My intellect got fried when reading the comment section.
@J. O. This comment is so relevant in these days lol
2:48 One champagne bottle didn't launch though D:
+PhotoandGrime (Pieke) JAJAJAJJAJAJAKAKAJJKJSJD ggggg
+JP DISORDER I guess you took off ..
+PhotoandGrime (Pieke) champagne deployment failure, emergency vodka administered
+DUKE NUKEM Luckily I always bring Tequila and lemons as well to any party I attend. To space we go!
+Shaza Maza The part in space is obviously fake, the rocket takeoff and landing seem real enough for me, and i'm a 3D graphics designer/game designer so i really know how far computer graphics have come.
SpaceX: "Hold my beer..."
Mr. Nagant SpaceX did it first actually
@@meezalamazala279
Actually Blue origins was the first, they did it on 23rd November 2015 and spaceX landed their rocket one month after on 21st of December 2015...
But the difference from the New Shepard and Falcon 9 is that the Falcon 9 is much bigger and heavier than the New Shepard and unlike the falcon 9, the New Shepard stays mostly vertical, making it less of a challenge to land it.
@Ponies And tank but not in one piece
@@meezalamazala279 id think so.. just one month later or am i wrong?
@@astrotw3680 " The Falcon 1 was the first rocket manufactured by SpaceX. It had a proposed capacity to carry 670 kilograms (1,480 lbs.) to low Earth orbit, and it flew between 2006 and 2009. "
Forget sub-orbital, SpaceX went to orbit before Jeff went to space
Space X has got some competition...
+Arraysion Space X will buy Blue Origin.
This is suborbital. Now they are working on orbital vehicles, but they are currently making massive strides in an area a lot easier and different from SpaceX. They can be less efficient and less (percentage) accurate.
+Benjamin Sturm Unlikely. Elon Musk net worth: ~$13B. Jeff Bezos net worth: ~$46.7B
+Arraysion Hopefully so. I'm a big Space X fan, but they need the competition. But as one person mentioned- that is really apples and oranges as far as the landings. Space X is attempting orbital launches with 300+ mile away landings, on a very volatile ocean platform.
Exciting times, either way.
+Benjamin Sturm i severely doubt it is for sale jeff bezos is work more than musk and he rather likes his venture now that he is selling rocket motors to ULA
I'm amazed by the torque control during landing. Obviously, a great team of engineers has been working on it. Congrats !
Blue Origin: I can land this tiny rocket
SpaceX: BIG FALCON ENERGY!!!
Manis Abdelli
I assume that he’s talking about the falcon heavy in which case it’s three boosters not one large one
Stop making these stupid "SpaceX is better than Blue Origin" jokes, they're not competing in any way
Manis Abdelli hmm
@@alfonsrasmus4710 That's not a competition. But that SpaceX is better, a fact
@@endergamesbr1322 well blue origin made a huge achievement, why can't we just celebrate that, why do we have to say "haha SpaceX good blue origin bad"
spacex is the clear winner.. this has been designed to land rather than for the dual purpose of taking payload into orbit and land like falcon.. only thing you can compare this is with the spacex grasshopper
+sam751990 This takes people into space. Different mission, different vehicle.
+Ambient Morality This takes people into space? Falcon 9 can put people in orbit with Dragon spacecraft!
***** At a much higher cost, and they don't plan to sell to customers. Whereas Blue Origin's business model is to take people on suborbital space tourist visits - SpaceX doesn't plan to do that ever.
+Ambient Morality Of course it's going to cost much to go into orbit and reach mach 30 rather than just go mach 3 and just touch the edge of the atmosphere.
Btw they are selling to customers and NASA is just one of them.
SpaceX main focus is to put people on mars.
***** Yes, but that doesn't mean they're the winner. They're not competing in the same market as Blue Origin. It's roughly like comparing the power of an iPhone versus a gaming desktop computer - an iPhone obviously has some ability to do light gaming, but its goal really is never to compete with a gaming computer. Is the gaming computer better at gaming? Sure but it's going to cost a lot more, be less portable, etc.
I'm aware of who SpaceX sells to. Blue Origin so far isn't selling anything, but I think we'll see the first flights being sold soon.
2:47 girl has some trouble popping the champagne.... lol!!
Lol
Kid: mom look your toy is flying
Mom:
:D
lmfao "it's missing the 2 things at the bottom tho mom"
@@josephius just a prototype version
@@IMPULSEplayz lol
Wtf lmao 🤣
That must be the vibrator my ex wife ordered via my Amazon account!
you tried
+Hubert Applebaum I thought it was just the right amount of inappropriate.
+Fable Srf Pahahaha
+Hubert Applebaum Yeah, but the head pops off!! Very scary!
***** You damn Commie!
The rocket landing isn't as smooth as SpaceX's rocket landings...
It's like reverse of launch of rocket.
@@gadzy we will see that on Saturday buddy 👀
One is tiny and the other is huge. That's why.
@@ffhgxxhjdz size of the rockets, jackass.
@@freshasian haha
@@gadzy Spacex landed a rocket first bud
this is sick!
Is this real?
+Michael Pietrzak yes it is
+MorninAfterKill Whats sick is people actually believe man or anything else can go into space. They cant get past the Van Allen Belt. It's a con job on you...
+John Oliver ok?!!?
+John Oliver FAIL. Must try harder.
That's amazing. Right out of the old 50's films.
+David Butler That was my first thought.
Who would have thought that what was essentially economizing on the price of cheap special effects by running the film in reverse to make it look like a landing for a movie would now be done in real life, but with having to resort to trick film photography!
PinkOld I'd seen the SpaceX crashes and just started to think it was a technology beyond our ability, but damn, here it is. Such a small rocket too! Looking forward to seeing more tests and the first manned flight.
+David Butler Try to not underestimate how much harder an orbital landing is than a simple VTOL landing. Not to mention how much larger the Falcon 9 rockets are than the Blue Origin rockets, which also makes it much easier to land.
***** True, but I just damn near wouldn't believe it possible without seeing it now.
+Colton Wishon
This isn't just a VTOL landing though. The gimbal control is successful. The Earth was busy rotating underneath the vehicle as soon as it took off. The ascent and descent angles were not nearly as steep, but it still landed in the field of view of their LZ cameras!
Great landing!
Guys the only fake part is the CGI from 1:13 to 1:34 to show what it will be like for the passengers. The takeoff and landing is 100% real and this venture has been working towards this for years.
+Christopher Lilly 1.51 to 2.15 are CGI. look at the flame on the rocket and also, obviously, the dust blown up on the surface before it lands, its not even that good CGI.
+howard hassen That isn't CGI. If that was, mad probs to those guys! But really. That's actual footage, otherwise it would say so on the bottom right.
+howard hassen lmao when someone says "bad cgi" at real video
Falcon 9 has entered the chat
Blue Origin: RUN!
You know elon musk start space x with 100m dollers jeff bezos started blue orgins with 100b dollers
So you should have some respect for space x
@Philippines_mapper19 - SFS Starship SN15 has entered the chat
@@luckyx9808 yeah, spacex's first launch happened on the middle of the Pacific Ocean
You'd think a bunch of rocket scientists would know how to spray champagne bottles.
+Maarten Mulders I don't expect space scientists to know how to build a house or repair a car or make a wood table or chair, etc, everyone is a specialist on their respective fields and a noob on others, perhaps those scientists were noobs at parties, you know, when you party to much you don't invent impressive tech. ;P
+Argoon1981 he's talking about the thrust from the champagne bottles so to speak.
+Argoon1981 savage 24/7
Incredible, I cant imagine the awesome engineering nightmare involved in keeping the thing in balance the whole time and the ultra fine precision that is needed in the thrust.
Competition is a good thing to any industry.
Yes, but Jeff is not in it for the species or the science. He's in it for the money. Therefore, he will never be able to achieve what space is is doing, or at least not for another decade or more.
I love how it comes down off center and makes a last second correction to translate to the center of the pad. If I try to do the same lateral flight maneuver in KSP, I'll crash. But that rocket makes it look so easy.
The engine at 1:57 “YOU JUST GOT VECTORED”
very nice! now try doing it without MechJeb
+John Buluba came here to say the same thing, you beat me to it
Lol...
+Wes Cilldhaire Don't worry; you still got like 10 likes on your reply.
+John Buluba oh my god im dying XDDD
lol
"A life changing adventure is coming soon"
And hopefully finally bringing an end to the Flat Earth Society. :P
Maybe not soon, in retrospect.
nope. because this is fake and you all been duped by CGI yet again!!!!!!! earth still flat.
But it needs a flat earth to land on. Do you realize how difficult it is to stand or even walk on a ball?
ruclips.net/video/Zpme3-qdyz4/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/gVEVmCDRklY/видео.html
@@NICEFINENEWROBOT funny
@@ConsciousTruth dummy
Go blue origins, impressive,
So when will the orbit test flight take place?
Congratulations to everyone at #BlueOrigin ! You all did an amazing job! Man I wish I could be there with you along this epic journey you've embarked on! Please hire me? :)
Space x: Awwww that's so cute.
People: Yes it is.
lmao
blue origin: hey! im older than you!
spacex: oh crap you're right
@@ZSVisuals Blue Origin: bruh, im in the space tourism game remember? I bring people from up to down like my rival Virgin Galactic.
@@greentea1396 Blue Origin: here's a giant orbital and moon payload rocket.
@@themoon5279 Space X: nice
Good, now Flat earthers have no excuse.
That's the truth
They're probably going to complain about the cgi stuff in this video when the orbit was in space lel.
+General Sarasota They'll say all the footage are faked.
+General Sarasota Since it's suborbital it's totally flat Earth compatibile.
why because someone made a cartoon on a tv screen?
holy fuck you people are sick.
trillions of money in taxes and still waiting for a picture of earth.....you're happy at least. money well spent.
it's no surprise.....you space fuck boys get boners over anime cartoons.....you getting a boner over this cartoon would be no different.
you refuse to use your brain and just do as you're told, whatever is inside your dogmatic belief system.....but others are stupid? got it.
good luck learning whatever your masters require.
I love the fact that they made it look like there was astronauts inside
Those are test-dummies but ok
Where do I sign? This just moved to the top of my Bucket List.
+William Turcotte You can sign up with me via PayPal, Send me £500,000 and I'll email you the tickets when ready for launch.
Great! Can I get a group discount for 6? Free Shipping?
It is a big dildo with rocket thrust!
Congratulations, this is great! I wonder what the price for a trip as a tourist will be
+MultiKauz everything will be very expensive at first, but then, everything goes cheaper. There's time mate, there's time.
+Rizky wp Yeah BUT WERE NOT EXACTLY IMMPORTAL MATEY
+Fabulous Muffin Cryogenic sleep...
Mind Blow WE HAVEN'T EXACTLY FIGURED THAT OUT SECOND IN COMMAND MATEY. BY THE WAY HOW DO I TURN CAPS LOCKS OFF???/
+Fabulous Muffin IDK, but I give cryogenic sleep another 15 to 20 years until we figure it out
Even if Jeff spend his all Billions, he can't buy a mind like Elon's...
That's the difference between spacex and blue origin.
My guess is that both Elon and Jeff are both far enough removed from the actual development of the rocket it doesn't matter for shit, but I'm sure they both understand what's going on. Elon is obviously smarter than Jeff, but what you said is not a good comparison.
Jeff an a hole
😂
I mean they have different goals. Elon wants mars but Bezos wants O’Neill cylinders.
SpaceX is transparent about their rocket development but Blue Origin is more secretive. From what I know, Blue Origin is closer to getting New Glenn done than SpaceX with starship.
You guys rock. Don't let the haters bring you down after the other guys' success. Keep rocketing and stuff.
is it free shipping to space over 35$
Free shipping if you have prime membership
Five years later: Still haven’t been to orbit. Still haven’t launched astronauts. Still resting comfortably on their laurels.
EDIT: Well, they haven't given up. They've launched astronauts now. I don't wish any bad on them, only that they would improve and reach their full potential!
Resting on their fat funding is what you mean
this is still rocket science and maybe theyre just being silent
Not anymore July 20th lift off
@@vtecniko0091 except for orbiting
@@beasticks8344 baby steps
not from orbital speed, this is more of an "up then down" maneuver. still impressive!
.
I am pretty sure SpaceX just broke the record.
.
Escape for Mankind What do you mean "No shit??. I didn't hear about all over the news. I just watched spaceX's youtube videos.
+Escape for Mankind Can you elaborate on what you meant by "Prove their theory"? .. whose and what theory do you mean? And, why the Sherlock comment? Cmon.
I'm more or most amazed at how the rocket could come back down backwards, straight and land that way..!
It's almost 4 years later and Blue Origin still hasn't put humans in space on this rocket.
Soon? This was 5.5 years ago.
While sub orbital flight is not the same as SpaceX returning from orbital flight, I still think Blue Origin has done an amazing job. I'm excited to see what their future holds.
+Jeffrey Root Suborbital space is about 62 miles above Earth, which is the maximum heights New Shepard can reach. The International Space Station is 4 times higher than that. Until then we cannot compare Blue Origin to SpaceX but we can compare Blue Origin to Virgin Galactic in that they are in the same competition.
+Jeffrey Root
There's no such thing as "suborbital space." There's just space. There are suborbital flights *into* space, and there are orbital flights *into* space. The main difference between suborbital and orbital is how fast you're going. Orbital flights are at much higher speeds than suborbital flights.
+Guy Gantor Sorry guy Gantor. I should have said suborbital flight rather than suborbital space. I didn't mean to offend you. Point being, SpaceX is trying to do something much harder and the Falcon 9 is in a completely different competition than New Shepherd.
Is this going to make 1-hour shipping for prime members?
Fantastic achievement, congrats to the whole team!
What it's the name of the music?
Here some people are making joke of "Blue Origin" but reality is that both blue origin and space X are doing great work at their place...
I respect both space X and blue origin 🖤💙....
Only spacex. Blue orgin has to work hard. No improvements yet
the falcon 9 landing is definitely cooler. new shepard decelerates to a very low velocity then land while the falcon 9 decelerates at a constant rate. HOVER SLAM
I like how Jeff bezos said what spacex is trying to do is the same in an interview (a very rich billionaire can be so cheap) , then just recently announces to launch an orbital flight by the end of the decade. Spacex might be doing their first landings on mars by then.
Pitou
The hover slam is a suicide burn really, PR purposes, they called it that. Love SpaceX!
Yeah sure, I hope your not stupid enough to put your money where your mouth is and invest in spacex. Go drive in your gay rich boy Tesla watch spacex crash and burn!
@@kedityt Suicide burn is the most efficient way to land in terms of fuel economy.
@@downallyourstreets
I can sense the only thing burning here is your ass after SpaceX's massive success.
Benjobum aged just like milk
I am so happy for you. This is one of the most difficult things in Astronautics. Congrats from Blue Origin!!!
ONE of
Elon musk 2021: Can't get up into orbit
That landing was simply stunning. Very Scott Manley-esque !
wow ive been a fan of elon for a long and followed him, i haven't really noticed that jeff is doing these things too, that's amazing! i've heard of blue origin but i didn't know that jeff was behind this.. That's cool, very interesting guy and with limitless resources, he could really achieve great things for all of humanity, im really excited to follow blue origin too now!
If only he was achieving great things for all of humanity and not just a literal handful of extremely wealthy individuals...
Let's call it the flat-earther-convincer 2000
You'll never convince flat-earthers. Theirs is a closed systematic delusion. Withstanding even electroshock therapy.
imagen spacex and blue origin work together and make a orbital trourism so you can see the earth spinning
@@greentea1396 If I try to be a hardcore flat-earther, will I get a free flight "to convince me"? I AM A HARDCORE FLAT-EARTHER HEAR ME I WANT A FREE FLIGHT!!
@@NICEFINENEWROBOT eeehhhh.... ask him
jeff bezoz or maybe another year or so wait until this pandemic ends lol
@@greentea1396 I have the Mars virus. Insatiable hunger to breathe the clear unpolluted airs of Mars. Run thru the dunes. Feel the wind and the freedom... Maybe a little outdoor campfire, frying Marsmallows, with the earth above... how wonderful! I go for it!
It lands a little weird it moves a lot. Overall nice landing
Well, other people may be SpaceX nerds & Blue Origin haters. So be it. I am a SpaceX nerd, and I also love Blue Origin. I love space. Period.
Это было круто!!! Уникальная точность и синхронность! Даже не представляю через что прошлось пройти инженерам, чтобы отработать момент касания с землей!
Мое уважение разработчикам, инженерам, рабочим, и конечно Джеффу!!
RIP Science Fiction. Welcome Science Reality!
Where are the burnt marks on the floor after the rocket landed? Only see bottom of the "rocket" slightly charred, but what about the floor where all that rocket fuel blasted against?
+St S Surprisingly, concrete holds up very well to the exhaust of a rocket. It's probably the high-temp resistant concrete they've used for the VTOL jump-jets like the Harrier and the F-35, which can easily push off exhaust and take the high-temp environment easily.
+St S Ever seen Kennedy Space Center's Pad 39, where the used to launch the shuttle? Giant concrete bunker, still around, still launching rockets off it. (Soon.) The shuttle had a shitload more thrust. The pad for the rocket will be fine.
Concrete & Fire are mankind's greatest tools, and here they are more than the sum of their parts, indeed.
I must say...I'm pretty fucking impressed!! Looks like a dream, still can't believe what I just saw. That precise landing, those thrusters keeping it vertical. Incredible just incredible!
I think blue origin deserves more support, especially from the public.
Whoa! That was incredible! Kinda phallic... the ground shook, and it was out of this world. Was it good for you? lol :)
would have been, if SpaceX hadn't already nailed this stunt in 2013!!!
+Robert Johnson They didn't.
Sten Ritterfeld Grasshopper couldn't do that at all. It'd crash even if it had enough fuel anyway, which it doesn't
Sten Ritterfeld Grasshopper wasn't suborbital, that's my point. It went to a few hundred meters, then back. It never had the ability to go to even near space, and especially not to guide itself back to a safe landing if it managed to get into space.
+Ambient Morality It had the ability to go up higher, but wasn't allowed to.
Mid Night Cool, but it didn't. It (F9R-Dev1, the successor to Grasshopper that flew a few times) did actually attempt a flight up to 3000m with 3 engines instead of one, but it exploded on ascent and they didn't worry about replacing it.
Beautiful, beautiful. I've never expected the incredible success. Yea, it's really incredible!!
+Sim Shalom Just because the booster rocket have to fix 11 degree of freedom, i.e., position (x,y,z), velocity (u,v,w), attitude(pitch,roll), angler rate (pitch rate, roll rate, yaw rate).
If you wanna see a real landing go to the Spacex youtube channel.
Gamer2001 Yeah!
shut up fanboys
Neo Socialist says the socialist
Why, I just saw the first reusable rocket landing right here, nothing fell over or blew up so why would I want to waste my time with SpaceX shitshow -go troll elsewhere!
cant you just enjoy the fact that we are re using rockets?? also, quick history lesson blue origin was the first to land their rocket
Every parent is proud when they see their child can drive a car to the end of the driveway and then drive all the way back in reverse.
But it's a completely different story when they drive an 18-wheeler down the driveway then around the block. Then they put it in reverse and drive it all the way back and back into the same driveway.
who tf would allow their child to drive a car
SpaceX rockets are made for sending satellites to orbit. Blue origin is looking to have space tourism. Nonetheless, landing a rocket is still hard.
Wow! Nice Definitely not a trivial accomplishment, no matter the size.
But I do think the SpaceX approach is better, so far. He’s delivered a lot of cargo and now astronauts to the ISS and put a lot of satellites in orbit.
I love that there are companies finally advancing the space indurstry, but let's not get over excited about things:
They reached space, not orbit. So currently this is at most a rocket powered elevator, or a wicked theme park ride. In order for this to be groundbreaking, they'd pretty much have to reach orbit, then land.
Edit: People, seriously, I get that the thing landed. Reusable! Woot! :D
I get that it's the first single stage rocket that went up to space and back and did a propulsive landing. I merely pointed out that getting to space is not so interesting if you can't keep on being in space (AKA achieve orbit), even if your rocket is reusable. When BO or SX find a way to make the entire thing "rapidly reusable", that's where the groundbreaking will happen.
+András Kühn a groundbreaking része az,hogy vissza is jött a rakéta :D
Igen, de alapvetően csak a SpaceX rekordját tolták meg felfelé, amit ők már pár éve felállítottak a Falcon 1 és 9-cel. Szal értem én. Ügyesek. Magasabb. "Ez már az űr." De kb semmit se jelent mert ez a rakéta nem jó kb semmire mert nem képes felvinni dolgokat földkörüli pályára, hanem függőlegesen felszáll magas(abb)ra és leszáll. Pályára állítani valamit kicsit nehezebb mert ahhoz kell még a talonba durván 7 km/sec-nyi deltaV, amihez nagyobb rakéta is kell, meg több stage. Nem az a nehéz hogy eljuss az űrig meg vissza, hanem hogy pályára is állíts valamit és utána szállj le minden alkatrésszel. Majd ha az sikerül, az lesz groundbreaking.
+András Kühn - not exactly true - this is only first stage of rocket. For now, for every flight you have to build new one, which is over 50% of costs for space flight. But if You can use first stage multiple times - whola, You got flight to orbit for only 50% of today costs.
+Wojtek Sykurski It's not an "only first stage" - New Shepard is a single stage suborbital rocket meant for manned flight. (There will be a derivative rocket designed for orbital flights, but it's a different project and not a priority). They've been iterating vehicles not because of their inability to reuse them, cause they do have it, but because they are progressing in a development, and AFAIK they did not build a new one for every flight, no idea where you got that information from.
Also, FYI: SpaceX wants to reuse only the first stage. Second stage is expandable, like in any other multistage rocket out there. Your assessment that it's decreasing the price by only 50% is obviously false.
+SkywalkerWroc - You are talking only about this configuration ;) According to some speculations and news on forum.nasaspaceflight.com/ i think that BO may also want to go for LEO flights (same as SpaceX).
But definitely, they have different strategy than SpaceX - first build something smaller but working, than go further.
Amazing rocket landing 🚀 Jeff
why are you guys downplaying besos' mind? he created one of the greatest commercial empires ever
It really is an achievement to be the third company to successfully drone launch and land such a rocket. The Delta clipper being first, SpaceX second and Blue Origin now third. Who will be the first to bring paying customers to space?.. I mean passengers, SpaceX's deliveries to the space station aren't passengers. Well there the russians.. I guess their first. The point is, whoever brings safe affordable access to space will benefit themselves as well as the world.
it's gonna be great, this will bring a big competition, the best kind of competition, one thing i wonder is 8 years from now i wanna know how many rocket launches in a month?
OMG, the gymbal and the landing, EXTREME Nerd Gasm.
+FLAT STONE You are soooo cool!
+FLAT STONE Extreme gullible idiot-gasm from hell. Dumbass.
+numbynumb um... whats your problem.
FLAT STONE Just amazed by what unsuspecting suckers so many people seem to be. I was just letting you know that this video is obviously fake. I guess that was not the most polite way of saying it... but I was just kind of bewildered by the comments here.
okay then, where does the rocket go when its launched, since its so fake.
Tickets starting from how much?
-also you should ad a website for that 😂
All in all, the landing was pretty amazing
The Glans capsule, after vigorously penetrating space, safely deployed it's prophylactic chute. The mighty Shaft, having fueled the climax of this event, thrust it's way back to a fully erect landing. Faces were squirted with champagne. Then everyone smoked a cigarette & took a nap.
Pure comment comedy gold!
😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣
@AGP I mean the earth is a ball
Is this for real?! They actually launched an actual big rocket and did a powered landing?!
Yes it's real! But it is not a very big rocket. Only 1/4 size of Falcon 9 or Atlas V Rockets. Fly's to about 100 km altitude and not at earth orbital speeds.
+Sander Buruma No it's not. CGI and bad acting...
+Dreamer 111 only the part with people in space was fake. the test done was unmanned.
Clay Norrbin That part was made to look especially fake, so the rest SEEMS more real. BUT it's ALL FAKE. No burn marks from the landing? Yeah... it's FAKE
Dreamer 111 www.theverge.com/2015/11/24/9790510/blue-origin-reusable-rockets-vertical-landing-spacex even Elon Musk said it was real, and they are sort of rival company's. Of course, he brings up how much bigger his rockets are. Still, Blue Origins has the first successful reussable first stage.
we should appreciate jeff for his hard work.
Why, he's in it for the money and not the Science or for the species.
@@glock19gen3 Ahh..... still it's work.
Blue origin:
I sent a tictac to space
SpaceX:
I sent my own car to orbit Mars on the world's most powerful rocket
Saturn V: world's most powerful rocket eh?
It doesn't orbit mars, it orbits the sun
Come on guys, it's not rocket science... oh wait.
+tibor29 It's rocket surgery. /s
ITS JOHN CENA
+Omfg BACON duh duh duh duh
this would be so much better MINUS the animation.....the general public will dismiss the real history made because of the animated sequence.......please re-edit!
I cant imagine a bunch of serious engineers deciding to make this rocket look the way it does
Oh my, yet another innovative Seattle company. Coffee, computer technology, retailers, airplanes, trucks, and now spaceships. What's next?
+TheSilverEnthusiast
*My City, Palmdale CA, just received a $60 billion Defense Contract 2 weeks ago for the next generation Bomber, built by Northrup Grumman, about 3 miles from me at Air Force Plant 42*
Escape for Mankind Awesome! Good to hear the U.S. is still somewhat great, haha. Btw, nice profile pic.
+Escape for Mankind The worst president ever is little Bush Jr, it's not even up for debate.
TheMusketITuckedIt
*You don't know what you're talking about.*
Escape for Mankind Personally, I think they are/were both awful
Everyone:SpaceX
But give some respect to blue origin, they are trying.
BO are great, it just need some time.
H I S T O R I C
very historic, people couldent do better than this right?
Congratulations Blue Origin - hats off to D. Wysong and team!!!!
Wow, that first stage landing was so wobbly the falcon 9 touches down accurately
2:45 *_-Welcome back, New Shepard_*
I don’t care what people say, this was a huge moment in spaceflight
This is what humanity is about cant believe we have come so far good luck 2 moro Jeff
Next step: go to orbit and back. You can do it!
Obviously you know nothing the rocket drops away before orbit is reached, you can learn if you pay attention though!
Pfs, SpaceX just showed you guys how big boys do it
Agreed, This first landing did show spacex how to do it right
Jeff who?
Great work, congratulations.
Wouldn't it be more economical and safer to design both the rocket and capsule to return as airplanes landing on runways? And the launching too?
Who’s here after NASA picks SpaceX